From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2CBC35DE6 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BA352084E; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="K8uKU6w2"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="j8EdOzFx"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="tsH+RQq9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8BA352084E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j6NIn-0005hV-9C; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:38:17 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j6NIm-0005hK-8B for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:38:16 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=q86n0/Atkm4Y4ZtubbVGTblHU1TxdG/2icnoc8+Xwo0=; b=K8uKU6w2aC/A/6MkxdsIQAcCiU Fw33DWaUFqEkT//UNFWgYlNHFjhBA0tJVBgw7St6KiNPmP5TaCnuQ6cDscCb9gNmBPdTSeJY1/WjX dQtQ0Mrtk8Zhd2KBY80z6HEw8KogsvQBmE3OxeYYnJ1cOnoy2UWoqII99PWDf3HHz4WQ=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=q86n0/Atkm4Y4ZtubbVGTblHU1TxdG/2icnoc8+Xwo0=; b=j8EdOzFxlW41LMDPXZAaAa/sDZ kybpnKhJ+Cxuks1wWS4cdnx8FF+FTnIeyOBuZakhoUe41tS9HXzNx4ic9gI0zjtI2wFNIM+kyHCQg 4Z2b97tHhWXZwamld3NAPIATB6S5BqS18LeDpKiniaPu2Fonly8HI9lH+xIj9bAVftIs=; Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1j6NIl-0092OD-4C for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:38:16 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=q86n0/Atkm4Y4ZtubbVGTblHU1TxdG/2icnoc8+Xwo0=; b=tsH+RQq9nsdWo8IIY9tkNpYUNU XgrNdOr80eLKEtXvEFno8gvU4qBdtiN5909aTbWi0i4Mn192mp414I4f7ImjuKXsQEPhOibS7bTwU cOsxCIWLp2zKT3TrsWxL2LBmNdhy2TDXl8m50nN4H1fo5ZuoIqjiPZzhYNjCMDBSq643wPIW66ATo c2u37N+UIz34xOGA5lZnneTU0FiBG/QNqURtzRbfxDmVDDvcVQXxx2J9oSjbcL56/SnvF6ZaDdp5f xwB90p+ijsqr/WHbcdu8Ex6TI2tXeVKVR+0eEXlgj0Omm7bgRLCdF0x20EQH304R+C2d0zp+9SCLy d4HdDp4A==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j6NIV-00021I-MY; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:37:59 +0000 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:37:59 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stanley Chu Message-ID: <20200224233759.GC30288@infradead.org> References: <20200221115050.238976-1-satyat@google.com> <20200221115050.238976-7-satyat@google.com> <20200221172244.GC438@infradead.org> <20200221181109.GB925@sol.localdomain> <1582465656.26304.69.camel@mtksdccf07> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1582465656.26304.69.camel@mtksdccf07> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-Headers-End: 1j6NIl-0092OD-4C Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v7 6/9] scsi: ufs: Add inline encryption support to UFS X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Ladvine D Almeida , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Kim Boojin , Kuohong Wang , Parshuram Raju Thombare , Barani Muthukumaran , Satya Tangirala , Eric Biggers , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 09:47:36PM +0800, Stanley Chu wrote: > Yes, MediaTek is keeping work closely with inline encryption patch sets. > Currently the v6 version can work well (without > UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_CRYPTO quirk) at least in our MT6779 SoC platform > which basic SoC support and some other peripheral drivers are under > upstreaming as below link, > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?state=% > 2A&q=6779&series=&submitter=&delegate=&archive=both > > The integration with inline encryption patch set needs to patch > ufs-mediatek and patches are ready in downstream. We plan to upstream > them soon after inline encryption patch sets get merged. What amount of support do you need in ufs-mediatek? It seems like pretty much every ufs low-level driver needs some kind of specific support now, right? I wonder if we should instead opt into the support instead of all the quirking here. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel