From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322F1C0044D for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D72A2072F; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="mvG5V9XU"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="LQlGVX7s"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AFREYax8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9D72A2072F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jC5GX-0001nU-Hj; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:35:33 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jC5GW-0001nI-Jt for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:35:32 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zKJ+YEkEw7A18umBYOZPQE46xiKsXK62wC8gi/w2Mto=; b=mvG5V9XUANsR567m/rlscDE3Vb qOBUuIZKEh6HyV12IEefr/AxE9APiiWCz9pU+iQm1kvLjwXKkpflaBbMjDTaxeKp1az7/biNAfT68 wKU42MWkf9HclLYxZUtS/fSpuyBRtQIgkwZyUbR2gGaMFBfT0DfjiGcfKHtdToqDhpMQ=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zKJ+YEkEw7A18umBYOZPQE46xiKsXK62wC8gi/w2Mto=; b=LQlGVX7s9+OIWp/FbdaWnpomva 8FqunpMG+DduAoZbbaDtu/MXTbKp9ycnqFZxpZbSXfK4Zz39X7n1pzIn23VI0u6cel4b2+bv7h8ia 27IkGzG/Cznjtf4Ozt3QDFFFtuaRetqhWFp0SuWAIQRxKtcrQ1dKq5ESTbCYthYrfzjo=; Received: from [198.145.29.99] (helo=mail.kernel.org) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jC5GT-008btu-CS for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:35:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.1.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57EBA2072F; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:35:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583948114; bh=uRPyYMPVAszfnVKvro8kpzdf0xTwiUPLRA5JUmq/v9A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AFREYax8HihMgrTlVKVrpk3AA9/wEAT4h2oCHN1AyBMB7R+05HA2C0vFxIJMHH27R UPkC4nDbncZxW0a7COmWptXuSEreRqBTWA6DrlfAZg5l5dN1cyosfdQT2vN4xMPlh0 7y7peuTKexQxFbK0VPX1Og1l2zOYka3QVDU2pjwc= Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:35:13 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Linus Torvalds Message-ID: <20200311173513.GA261045@google.com> References: <20200311162735.GA152176@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Headers-End: 1jC5GT-008btu-CS Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [GIT PULL] f2fs for 5.6-rc6 X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 03/11, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 9:27 AM Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > > Sorry for late pull request. Could you please consider this? > > I pulled this, and then immediately unpulled. > > Most (all?) of the commits have been committed basically minutes > before you sent the pull request. > > That's simply not acceptable. Not when we're in late rc, and with > hundreds of lines of changes, and when there is no explanation for a > late pull request that was very very recently generated. I actually merged the last three patches which were introduced yesterday. I thought that it'd be fine to pull in, since they are quite trivial several lines of code changes. Others were merged over a week ago, and I've tested in the mean time. It seems the commit times were modified as recent date, when I reorganized there-in commits aligned to other branch, dev-test. Probably, I had to keep the commit date in somehow. Thanks, > > Linus _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel