From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B855C47254 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 19:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56EBC20663; Tue, 5 May 2020 19:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="h2y4LVdS"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="PM6z3uEG"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Q9Is3IRW" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 56EBC20663 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW2of-0000hX-Mp; Tue, 05 May 2020 19:01:17 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW2oe-0000hO-I2 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 05 May 2020 19:01:16 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5mJnkmCotb0tVp778KZsffXdscMhySCoKbefLJW0xpA=; b=h2y4LVdSaaBUvq0IFvwF4akzUu bX6rn77qlbMoEAEvEKXGcZVSSRn4yoUPvAaCA/IAbtBMAKhQTJZsXsiJTjljRIruzL+TMipsB7Z/p QMNdrPVvY4CqShryQkGWmBcdneTxBThENZHVD5o8CnZls+IVy+RfKWJP04BwH4UNqdvU=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5mJnkmCotb0tVp778KZsffXdscMhySCoKbefLJW0xpA=; b=PM6z3uEGHTKMneWWyIMx2r6TR+ iT0wD8+dPodo+2fSF2nQAv5K5rtew/ESlMSijvNfpi7hQEQ1BXhIZohRyK4B2phCz5LxWftjmhq2w LWAMXwsw4qZ4RCmUBXUoIo4B7b733WnPibPEkVuCu/zJ3hZuFtN9qkANlmFtHWzMN2As=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jW2od-00EmZH-FO for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 05 May 2020 19:01:16 +0000 Received: from sol.localdomain (c-107-3-166-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [107.3.166.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C27A120721; Tue, 5 May 2020 19:01:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588705269; bh=BZtLJRZM1ELXagARN2dB3BtMJyx+5UOFE8fa/QlEPmw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q9Is3IRW3exH7Z8EgzlDpPYb8lw7lPWzkhqFt64feVmD1T0gryKxdnb4sUTcYauev oI6qJaX40yGxFm38jqffbdJPRTW7N5th6tQr/U44bWkE9Jcn7HPc181S3rAmh5LqVy kmAyid8yccRLaJv/89RXG07gRwDdftt5YoJMAEYQ= Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 12:01:08 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Jaegeuk Kim Message-ID: <20200505190108.GB128280@sol.localdomain> References: <20200505153139.201697-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20200505165847.GA98848@gmail.com> <20200505181323.GA55221@google.com> <20200505181941.GC98848@gmail.com> <20200505184932.GC55221@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200505184932.GC55221@google.com> X-Headers-End: 1jW2od-00EmZH-FO Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: get parent inode when recovering pino X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:49:32AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > How about this? > > From 2a6b0e53e592854306062a2dc35db2d8f79062f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jaegeuk Kim > Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 11:33:29 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: find a living dentry when finding parent ino > > We need to check any dentry still alive to get parent inode number. > > Suggested-by: Eric Biggers > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim > --- > fs/f2fs/file.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c > index a0a4413d6083b..95139cb85faca 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c > @@ -169,9 +169,8 @@ static int get_parent_ino(struct inode *inode, nid_t *pino) > { > struct dentry *dentry; > > - inode = igrab(inode); > - dentry = d_find_any_alias(inode); > - iput(inode); > + /* Need to check if valid dentry still exists. */ > + dentry = d_find_alias(inode); > if (!dentry) > return 0; > It's fine, but it could use some more explanation. (What's a "valid dentry"?) How about the following? >From f8fe7d57eead1423e8548ac7a5ec881d701466a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Biggers Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 11:41:11 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: correctly fix the parent inode number during fsync() fsync() may be called on a deleted file that's still open. So when fsync() tries to set the parent inode number when the inode has LOST_PINO and i_nlink == 1 (to avoid later checkpoints), it needs to make sure to get the parent directory via a non-deleted alias. Also remove the unnecessary igrab() and iput(), as the caller already holds a reference to the inode. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers --- fs/f2fs/file.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c index 6ab8f621a3c5a2..b3069188fd3478 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c @@ -165,9 +165,11 @@ static int get_parent_ino(struct inode *inode, nid_t *pino) { struct dentry *dentry; - inode = igrab(inode); - dentry = d_find_any_alias(inode); - iput(inode); + /* + * Make sure to get the non-deleted alias. The alias associated with + * the open file descriptor being fsync()'ed may be deleted already. + */ + dentry = d_find_alias(inode); if (!dentry) return 0; -- 2.26.2 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel