From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8273FC28CBC for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 14:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D8A2208D5 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 14:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="WwA3Puoo"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="mVVBTWZf"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Xx0fK9Fb" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4D8A2208D5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWLTF-0003M8-Em; Wed, 06 May 2020 14:56:25 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWLTE-0003Lw-AI for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 06 May 2020 14:56:24 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aT4yOgEge3hTF3FaTKwc4a+1Sl1Mq9yw9j7lWipHnrc=; b=WwA3PuooiTR4UOz6V2Nwid61Q6 UoNitanMFieiaCrYlHpv9ZUjRdZHCB8E4aEYIKSRGLcepnt14W35C0rY27otcMT+Ecvs1G/MZNMpy 8iGfLRDU/YzD6yhlPtFZLIT4+2YHSmTD8I9SjXCVpGyZhanvzVDaHt5LapsWtMtPpD0s=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aT4yOgEge3hTF3FaTKwc4a+1Sl1Mq9yw9j7lWipHnrc=; b=mVVBTWZfj3kSiwuThwEKPmEjxp tqDuTJf8daQ0TJjwoTccGW7oWgbxoRW9NK/fTNyS0Xh95JxAbuBBZeN9g4XjyUgdkQjyYtX+KvPYR KjMJW0kTeO5wBk/l7UDtQVwk7C6MBsKV/9fkZ8Tx60M3Brx/uvGLyWkRUbdSJnjGiC7E=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jWLTC-009wMe-TZ for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 06 May 2020 14:56:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.1.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B32C208D5; Wed, 6 May 2020 14:56:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588776969; bh=LEE9kaUuq3swcyipv2Z5cVdwEM6Qz9YdRajLpVMAeUs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Xx0fK9FbNR3TwpC9RsM9U17z+Mt/rhgEorkbaAzNLrrJ5WXebxTK6DxpMb2Sts2Kt 2WZlLZ3Z4qZT1yyx73AZOjHrvnd1l+JnjbHu8P9OJ7Gz9mYE7Cx8da7oJKDsWObkY/ Ym2zOZ0YfaUYi7Ja/4gf4WIJLkZzi6HrVMsxYrx0= Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 07:56:08 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Chao Yu Message-ID: <20200506145608.GD107238@google.com> References: <20200504143039.155644-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <7177aab9-630e-e077-7005-0023c93134b3@kernel.org> <20200505230559.GA203407@google.com> <9aaeac5e-4511-5c81-653c-23a85b3c335a@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9aaeac5e-4511-5c81-653c-23a85b3c335a@huawei.com> X-Headers-End: 1jWLTC-009wMe-TZ Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: change maximum zstd compression buffer size X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2020/5/6 7:05, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 05/05, Chao Yu wrote: > >> On 2020-5-4 22:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>> From: Daeho Jeong > >>> > >>> Current zstd compression buffer size is one page and header size less > >>> than cluster size. By this, zstd compression always succeeds even if > >>> the real compression data is failed to fit into the buffer size, and > >>> eventually reading the cluster returns I/O error with the corrupted > >>> compression data. > >> > >> What's the root cause of this issue? I didn't get it. > >> > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong > >>> --- > >>> fs/f2fs/compress.c | 4 ++-- > >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c > >>> index 4c7eaeee52336..a9fa8049b295f 100644 > >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c > >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c > >>> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static int zstd_init_compress_ctx(struct compress_ctx *cc) > >>> cc->private = workspace; > >>> cc->private2 = stream; > >>> > >>> - cc->clen = cc->rlen - PAGE_SIZE - COMPRESS_HEADER_SIZE; > >>> + cc->clen = ZSTD_compressBound(PAGE_SIZE << cc->log_cluster_size); > >> > >> In my machine, the value is 66572 which is much larger than size of dst > >> buffer, so, in where we can tell the real size of dst buffer to zstd > >> compressor? Otherwise, if compressed data size is larger than dst buffer > >> size, when we flush compressed data into dst buffer, we may suffer overflow. > > > > Could you give it a try compress_log_size=2 and check decompression works? > > I tried some samples before submitting the patch, did you encounter app's data > corruption when using zstd algorithm? If so, let me check this issue. Daeho reported: 1. cp -a src_file comp_dir/dst_file (comp_dir is a directory for compression) 2. sync comp_dir/dst_file 3. echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches 4. cat comp_dir/dst_file > dump (it returns I/O error depending on the file). > > Thanks, > > > > >> > >>> return 0; > >>> } > >>> > >>> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static int zstd_compress_pages(struct compress_ctx *cc) > >>> ZSTD_inBuffer inbuf; > >>> ZSTD_outBuffer outbuf; > >>> int src_size = cc->rlen; > >>> - int dst_size = src_size - PAGE_SIZE - COMPRESS_HEADER_SIZE; > >>> + int dst_size = cc->clen; > >>> int ret; > >>> > >>> inbuf.pos = 0; > >>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel > > . > > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel