From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63924C433DF for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 05:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35DDF206D4; Thu, 14 May 2020 05:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="F60OiqBy"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="j6ITS2CM"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="vwp8gJPP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 35DDF206D4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ69E-0002Cw-Np; Thu, 14 May 2020 05:11:08 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ69D-0002Cp-RN for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 14 May 2020 05:11:07 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aRUYfH1npGUt0W6zi8sjTImq1S1FjUnkANXJktv4/fQ=; b=F60OiqBy73Fic04/52jlNa7lsY XHejC1v1vnW7zYaoFusmctwEByAnoqjnUt63yY7y5e+1KFTXfS5z8CKePW53ja5s37Wk2T9DKT9s/ Pqfv8Yglu1Fvxt+WKzzD9NwL7SL1YeFFkpwXCqpacFEhAFtp7N1NbhhbtWYreDOop7rA=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aRUYfH1npGUt0W6zi8sjTImq1S1FjUnkANXJktv4/fQ=; b=j6ITS2CMU3rtyadHeywcRRcaHi ImqPdBz6e+AMpLs5ruIS2MYXXKDojx9aWAspTMXZfftjFFuqde0DHqrd5u3AnHl/TtqH8FYJnNfaX TYpoWfTedaa0jKFSx8DMUYrwyBWIn+ic0JWT6CMC+YMuaFvVYvtJqPuWv6ChOD2cvtgc=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jZ69C-009Q5J-IT for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 14 May 2020 05:11:07 +0000 Received: from sol.localdomain (c-107-3-166-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [107.3.166.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36449206D4; Thu, 14 May 2020 05:10:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1589433055; bh=+7Nv0uff65CHEgSOICQgU3aX0Fv+NjHfAe+0Cmtlgvw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=vwp8gJPPTHeKccZV7k1yrahp5FPT66Y2DslfqT+lmRhxMP08GBwTz6gcKkzO/spv5 dhRVa4d1xmYyCiUYotjlwDl+6Yx1Cl63diCalWTluZtVzGJY6PAaIGGs0O5HxHccw8 N7KmznuBnLJh5eiG0UuJOhCVU3xxHn0DpMuEAsGQ= Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 22:10:53 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Satya Tangirala , Jens Axboe Message-ID: <20200514051053.GA14829@sol.localdomain> References: <20200514003727.69001-1-satyat@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200514003727.69001-1-satyat@google.com> X-Headers-End: 1jZ69C-009Q5J-IT Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v13 00/12] Inline Encryption Support X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Kim Boojin , Kuohong Wang , Barani Muthukumaran , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:37:15AM +0000, Satya Tangirala wrote: > This patch series adds support for Inline Encryption to the block layer, > UFS, fscrypt, f2fs and ext4. It has been rebased onto linux-block/for-next. > > Note that the patches in this series for the block layer (i.e. patches 1, > 2, 3, 4 and 5) can be applied independently of the subsequent patches in > this series. Thanks, the (small) changes from v12 look good. As usual, I made this available in git at: Repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/fscrypt.git Tag: inline-encryption-v13 Jens, do you have any feedback on this patchset? Is there any chance at taking the block layer part (patches 1-5) for 5.8? That part needs to go upstream first, since patches 6-12 depend on them. Then patches 6-12 can go upstream via the SCSI and fscrypt trees in the following release. - Eric _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel