linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 18:56:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526015650.GA207949@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a44f9c2e-3859-6c5d-6f06-7c4c6b4c01c5@huawei.com>

On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/5/26 9:11, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2020/5/25 23:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >> On 05/25, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> On 2020/5/25 11:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>> Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages
> >>>
> >>> IMO, for umount case, we should drop dirty reference and dirty pages on meta/data
> >>> pages like we change for node pages to avoid potential dead loop...
> >>
> >> I believe we're doing for them. :P
> > 
> > Actually, I mean do we need to drop dirty meta/data pages explicitly as below:
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > index 3dc3ac6fe143..4c08fd0a680a 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > @@ -299,8 +299,15 @@ static int __f2fs_write_meta_page(struct page *page,
> > 
> >  	trace_f2fs_writepage(page, META);
> > 
> > -	if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> > +	if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> > +		if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> > +			ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > +			dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
> > +			unlock_page(page);
> > +			return 0;
> > +		}
> >  		goto redirty_out;
> > +	}
> >  	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> >  		goto redirty_out;
> >  	if (wbc->for_reclaim && page->index < GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, 0))
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index 48a622b95b76..94b342802513 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -2682,6 +2682,12 @@ int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct page *page, int *submitted,
> > 
> >  	/* we should bypass data pages to proceed the kworkder jobs */
> >  	if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> > +		if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> > +			ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > +			inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> > +			unlock_page(page);
> > +			return 0;
> > +		}
> 
> Oh, I notice previously, we will drop non-directory inode's dirty pages directly,
> however, during umount, we'd better drop directory inode's dirty pages as well, right?

Hmm, I remember I dropped them before. Need to double check.

> 
> >  		mapping_set_error(page->mapping, -EIO);
> >  		/*
> >  		 * don't drop any dirty dentry pages for keeping lastest
> > 
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>> in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> v3:
> >>>>  - fix wrong unlock
> >>>>
> >>>> v2:
> >>>>  - fix typos
> >>>>
> >>>>  fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>> index e632de10aedab..e0bb0f7e0506e 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>> @@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,
> >>>>  
> >>>>  	trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);
> >>>>  
> >>>> -	if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> >>>> +	if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> >>>> +		if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> >>>> +			ClearPageUptodate(page);
> >>>> +			dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
> >>>> +			unlock_page(page);
> >>>> +			return 0;
> >>>> +		}
> >>>>  		goto redirty_out;
> >>>> +	}
> >>>>  
> >>>>  	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> >>>>  		goto redirty_out;
> >>>>
> >> .
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> > .
> > 


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-22 14:47 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-22 23:32 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-25  3:56   ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-25  6:30     ` Chao Yu
2020-05-25 15:06       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-26  1:11         ` Chao Yu
2020-05-26  1:34           ` Chao Yu
2020-05-26  1:56             ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2020-05-27  2:35               ` Chao Yu
2020-05-27 20:56                 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-28  1:20                   ` Chao Yu
2020-05-25  2:16 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] " Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200526015650.GA207949@google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).