From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5652C433E0 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2A4F20768 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lists.sourceforge.net header.i=@lists.sourceforge.net header.b="OQRg/e5k"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="WGSEDV2T"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="BVhYlSxG"; dkim=neutral (0-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="hWHEcXJ9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A2A4F20768 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lists.sourceforge.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.sourceforge.net; s=beta; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc: Reply-To:From:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:To:References:Mime-Version:Message-Id: In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=wPg5nIXBbdcbiwCst3514BbtltyVe/Or/+xVq+9pml8=; b=OQRg/e5kzdtByEvstnKXwkBpk 7+TZKbQkErRkDdaHwiaf388PQOw67eHzP6E6GxO4dZ/Br6eA9QZY7lbHa6a8n6fej1rizmlGoGXSF gbsF2DZLEMkRxut9fxngYPP3C9O+AWGeLtuZ6ITY3RAGRU6wOGJFweRsbWU9e6Jmcooe4=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnyr1-0003Av-Oj; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:25:51 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <3t9fyXgYKADAPdaeQZSaaSXQ.OaY@flex--drosen.bounces.google.com>) id 1jnyr0-0003Ak-5l for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:25:50 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:From:Subject:References: Mime-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QODIzVeJrdT1s8AIsgAZkNeVeFFuI7HH8hKtZUq7344=; b=WGSEDV2T6oKh2FsCPC6zewISR oIt4c8z66gUuqvgbATxW0XU6ldvggMsET7xPzzYQa4x0yqeUUTUzraqIS5mixVAf8ERKTbgNQaEY9 TnoOG58SREhTTwO8Gw11Xbyda9mbSlO53lOO4EzxnvntuXGyxckCq5vm/JA8UlHj1iBeE=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:From:Subject:References:Mime-Version:Message-Id: In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QODIzVeJrdT1s8AIsgAZkNeVeFFuI7HH8hKtZUq7344=; b=BVhYlSxGCWfghjJJ6fOV/Hz1fK NXv5xFaUgF41kdlHJqeykLCBsK135DWfJMrRX484q6VCizOPlgSeLzBI62VdhL/+avSF9XfY23TPq A1DdEEbIgHyFSXBL00zlJr3NH0IwVq8uFmPsRmF2Cgg/DtI4/rOHgI5i4qqDNuCRjdvo=; Received: from mail-vs1-f73.google.com ([209.85.217.73]) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jnyqy-00Gk7N-Cd for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:25:50 +0000 Received: by mail-vs1-f73.google.com with SMTP id l19so681462vsp.1 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 23:25:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=QODIzVeJrdT1s8AIsgAZkNeVeFFuI7HH8hKtZUq7344=; b=hWHEcXJ9aNrUXZyw33b3LmQOzvvcHuDW/A59nhjR5XQMLw5Qc925QSXhkERNImFcTW hANpGu19yKJ5+ofMIYmkF6TKYrS6Nz04N8XYUx1I3Pa4GgUquwMBJKxs29u86c7WgX2K RRe307Q7mfy+NjviZftXsu8kT999uG5LrB4rhhXsgo5tbdmLXVI5wJc18RWcgCYEfr1k ek2aoIIofzYBCRkoj8bTxC0G24p8GbTIhh9lWGZ9g6Nn5ntXhMQoIPDlw//uXtbDJSXC eLkDvnHk0IzkMvraG+Dsoo9PjzeSb8M7sIqjzEN4gF1fxbic3Daktg/Se4hGo4hYuOdt NXmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=QODIzVeJrdT1s8AIsgAZkNeVeFFuI7HH8hKtZUq7344=; b=XQydOSV0cKlJAZozo9S+SxmLUbqqkpQmjJJrdNxjcWjvm7dxAmrNmvRF9HP+kbjnTG +tQLyQg6PgutKoDWNanIuFavewxMQAw+go0xjEZ0ngc90BpfmThajYtrS6JlcEBHo1A2 OGo1AK5mSTbLKqaFpB1z2t8J822Zg8YIwKYNEzG7li5C5jLQ6hYxhXRyMAbeDS8K0d5x BmLmmCJgEBZ8vrDHWcJuO1IZzPwuz0SYIRGRPuAIIkE6lqM+Voknx0XCn5bSsPpl7LDr DWxFyq84x4KvmWxXCFsa/qjUn+JUi3szaHOcxt6tGPFplpUpNg9kefY9ry+1JIivX3Yj F9bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533pjJHwaRkNu+LaxOuhUMl4RYTKkXeGv1Lg2p+SLqvQhZUNLU+r VIlMvk35K2//W6Mo0WSiWnVwLrzf4S0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWR2OSY2LIwmJtD7fXyPCoacDbLcf/0SnMpXGaS+dBq70pCLIvLZrm8yY4Wcv1/MkLvCZlNjW4Qew= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5533:: with SMTP id ba19mr5259319qvb.110.1592973239889; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:33:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200624043341.33364-1-drosen@google.com> Message-Id: <20200624043341.33364-3-drosen@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20200624043341.33364-1-drosen@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0.111.gc72c7da667-goog To: "Theodore Ts'o" , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , Chao Yu , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Eric Biggers , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , Richard Weinberger X-Headers-End: 1jnyqy-00Gk7N-Cd Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] fs: Add standard casefolding support X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Daniel Rosenberg via Linux-f2fs-devel Reply-To: Daniel Rosenberg Cc: Daniel Rosenberg , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net This adds general supporting functions for filesystems that use utf8 casefolding. It provides standard dentry_operations and adds the necessary structures in struct super_block to allow this standardization. Ext4 and F2fs will switch to these common implementations. Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg --- fs/libfs.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/fs.h | 22 ++++++++++ 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c index 4d08edf19c782..f7345a5ed562f 100644 --- a/fs/libfs.c +++ b/fs/libfs.c @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ #include #include #include +#include +#include #include @@ -1363,3 +1365,102 @@ bool is_empty_dir_inode(struct inode *inode) return (inode->i_fop == &empty_dir_operations) && (inode->i_op == &empty_dir_inode_operations); } + +#ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE +/** + * needs_casefold - generic helper to determine if a filename should be casefolded + * @dir: Parent directory + * + * Generic helper for filesystems to use to determine if the name of a dentry + * should be casefolded. It does not make sense to casefold the no-key token of + * an encrypted filename. + * + * Return: if names will need casefolding + */ +bool needs_casefold(const struct inode *dir) +{ + return IS_CASEFOLDED(dir) && dir->i_sb->s_encoding && + (!IS_ENCRYPTED(dir) || fscrypt_has_encryption_key(dir)); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(needs_casefold); + +/** + * generic_ci_d_compare - generic d_compare implementation for casefolding filesystems + * @dentry: dentry whose name we are checking against + * @len: len of name of dentry + * @str: str pointer to name of dentry + * @name: Name to compare against + * + * Return: 0 if names match, 1 if mismatch, or -ERRNO + */ +int generic_ci_d_compare(const struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int len, + const char *str, const struct qstr *name) +{ + const struct dentry *parent = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_parent); + const struct inode *inode = READ_ONCE(parent->d_inode); + const struct super_block *sb = dentry->d_sb; + const struct unicode_map *um = sb->s_encoding; + struct qstr qstr = QSTR_INIT(str, len); + char strbuf[DNAME_INLINE_LEN]; + int ret; + + if (!inode || !needs_casefold(inode)) + goto fallback; + /* + * If the dentry name is stored in-line, then it may be concurrently + * modified by a rename. If this happens, the VFS will eventually retry + * the lookup, so it doesn't matter what ->d_compare() returns. + * However, it's unsafe to call utf8_strncasecmp() with an unstable + * string. Therefore, we have to copy the name into a temporary buffer. + */ + if (len <= DNAME_INLINE_LEN - 1) { + memcpy(strbuf, str, len); + strbuf[len] = 0; + qstr.name = strbuf; + /* prevent compiler from optimizing out the temporary buffer */ + barrier(); + } + ret = utf8_strncasecmp(um, name, &qstr); + if (ret >= 0) + return ret; + + if (sb_has_enc_strict_mode(sb)) + return -EINVAL; +fallback: + if (len != name->len) + return 1; + return !!memcmp(str, name->name, len); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_ci_d_compare); + +/** + * generic_ci_d_hash - generic d_hash implementation for casefolding filesystems + * @dentry: dentry whose name we are hashing + * @str: qstr of name whose hash we should fill in + * + * Return: 0 if hash was successful, or -ERRNO + */ +int generic_ci_d_hash(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *str) +{ + const struct inode *inode = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_inode); + struct super_block *sb = dentry->d_sb; + const struct unicode_map *um = sb->s_encoding; + int ret = 0; + + if (!inode || !needs_casefold(inode)) + return 0; + + ret = utf8_casefold_hash(um, dentry, str); + if (ret < 0) + goto err; + + return 0; +err: + if (sb_has_enc_strict_mode(sb)) + ret = -EINVAL; + else + ret = 0; + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_ci_d_hash); +#endif diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index 3f881a892ea74..261904e06873b 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -1392,6 +1392,12 @@ extern int send_sigurg(struct fown_struct *fown); #define SB_ACTIVE (1<<30) #define SB_NOUSER (1<<31) +/* These flags relate to encoding and casefolding */ +#define SB_ENC_STRICT_MODE_FL (1 << 0) + +#define sb_has_enc_strict_mode(sb) \ + (sb->s_encoding_flags & SB_ENC_STRICT_MODE_FL) + /* * Umount options */ @@ -1461,6 +1467,10 @@ struct super_block { #endif #ifdef CONFIG_FS_VERITY const struct fsverity_operations *s_vop; +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE + struct unicode_map *s_encoding; + __u16 s_encoding_flags; #endif struct hlist_bl_head s_roots; /* alternate root dentries for NFS */ struct list_head s_mounts; /* list of mounts; _not_ for fs use */ @@ -3385,6 +3395,18 @@ extern int generic_file_fsync(struct file *, loff_t, loff_t, int); extern int generic_check_addressable(unsigned, u64); +#ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE +extern int generic_ci_d_hash(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *str); +extern int generic_ci_d_compare(const struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int len, + const char *str, const struct qstr *name); +extern bool needs_casefold(const struct inode *dir); +#else +static inline bool needs_casefold(const struct inode *dir) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif + #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION extern int buffer_migrate_page(struct address_space *, struct page *, struct page *, -- 2.27.0.111.gc72c7da667-goog _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel