From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43E9C433E1 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A42F0206CD for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="HBYLv0At"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="fEtbfCl7" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A42F0206CD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jslfo-0005ab-8D; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:22:04 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jslfm-0005aH-Nt for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:22:02 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version :References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=n84N7M6ll973nCmT+bT4PV1uyN1mDR1TL1DwqZKaqpI=; b=HBYLv0AtBJpBQzDxm2luWd0XO6 PkWqCcAAXmRN5FgIVCbPt4CfPQxPaxcm3Z0uMACzWDUInigZ4rUCpMdVjzpc2SH//USFCCJUD1MEv k4DQLUO+eP3bpyMOSr3wI0VLOPXqwK+C6Mhfj/nN10OocevV6K/JCvNnhA6Ta4VZ5Obc=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=n84N7M6ll973nCmT+bT4PV1uyN1mDR1TL1DwqZKaqpI=; b=fEtbfCl7O8+m07ZmMZU3Xt8t4R uAO3dJV5YvpelF6Q6TpOn95/bZ5qnXhWVsz/1LhRJlErZT1n0CwfHtoYIGbKfQhBsT/WoKRbQHacP yBfyhdP7HKziy9KhVqCObC93L35UN6F8m427FMtJaplZlVi6EPey3oPwkQDZZMhuUe5s=; Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jslfk-00D8KL-S0 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:22:02 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 33509EE35359BBB50C41; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:21:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from szvp000203569.huawei.com (10.120.216.130) by DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:21:44 +0800 From: Chao Yu To: Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:21:25 +0800 Message-ID: <20200707112128.89136-3-yuchao0@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200707112128.89136-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> References: <20200707112128.89136-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.120.216.130] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1jslfk-00D8KL-S0 Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/5] f2fs: record average update time of segment X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Previously, once we update one block in segment, we will update mtime of segment to last time, making aged segment becoming freshest, result in that GC with cost benefit algorithm missing such segment, So this patch changes to record mtime as average block updating time instead of last updating time. It's not needed to reset mtime for prefree segment, as se->valid_blocks is zero, then old se->mtime won't take any weight with below calculation: se->mtime = div_u64(se->mtime * se->valid_blocks + mtime, se->valid_blocks + 1); Signed-off-by: Chao Yu --- fs/f2fs/segment.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index 7419aa07cf08..9d10285932f9 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c @@ -2150,6 +2150,22 @@ static void __set_sit_entry_type(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type, __mark_sit_entry_dirty(sbi, segno); } +static void update_segment_mtime(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr) +{ + unsigned int segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr); + struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno); + unsigned long long mtime = get_mtime(sbi, false); + + if (!se->mtime) + se->mtime = mtime; + else + se->mtime = div_u64(se->mtime * se->valid_blocks + mtime, + se->valid_blocks + 1); + + if (mtime > SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime) + SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime = mtime; +} + static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del) { struct seg_entry *se; @@ -2169,10 +2185,9 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del) f2fs_bug_on(sbi, (new_vblocks >> (sizeof(unsigned short) << 3) || (new_vblocks > sbi->blocks_per_seg))); + update_segment_mtime(sbi, blkaddr); + se->valid_blocks = new_vblocks; - se->mtime = get_mtime(sbi, false); - if (se->mtime > SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime) - SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime = se->mtime; /* Update valid block bitmap */ if (del > 0) { -- 2.26.2 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel