From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AF1C433DF for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A7B02077D; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="N3K1PjJc"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="IyZorY+y"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="h7SUtk95" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9A7B02077D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtmWS-0008Fk-9S; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:28:36 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtmWR-0008Fd-5D for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:28:35 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=AXK65UWmfhsrsgJJWprbtmmlh2B8aXoqpdSpj1Nov/s=; b=N3K1PjJcSpXNtdVm9Br03C6Ybv gNrXWJQ/DzkzHDewjh4xh5w2+6hg3rjDqYKqHtee1B2GTD1jLjE9pNXi4rTNpX6ubNR9ql0tRK6F5 7XdQiBrXtFA1JKIybn/8PWFfCgKo7f63GwRSzwJ/aZjSeOpoFn7neWV2XLfX/gXy2WOw=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=AXK65UWmfhsrsgJJWprbtmmlh2B8aXoqpdSpj1Nov/s=; b=IyZorY+yYpIJmBGT8aTu1Qn/36 jaGgoh+LHGe0eIuvuDROH3eVwFMITSSbK/4h8zQLS4Em2fr73O7XOcNs5hTipKtQhMd8vegf5gZvv Ek7B5ldmIoShfdwrx5/8cwKfTa9DnVWdFcnAcHAEWErPc4QqKQcepjKvLk2TdQn4Hb8M=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jtmWN-00FuKR-IM for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:28:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.1.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4561F2077D; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:28:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1594362501; bh=r5glTjQ2tpYOHg0/Fuo52C8jYr9Q/DQLLc2qnFph3hQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=h7SUtk950AlDITQRL+yk1Eu18pZ2FDz5q7VUBHaK7lYY+0o6OJWZt2hJIHkzscbvH 5y4waUeoeH8qBkKEG7UOXOkVCfmlIas58rMz0TiI25Mp75dLsTpyQR35H6+5c+/oHZ rgmNF/vUOFzLd2TRCWd9irsN0JULCkGI4gVHQu9w= Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 23:28:20 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: lampahome Message-ID: <20200710062820.GA1531501@google.com> References: <20200710034114.GG545837@google.com> <20200710042502.GJ545837@google.com> <20200710051429.GA864598@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Headers-End: 1jtmWN-00FuKR-IM Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] possible to allocate a full segment for a direct IO with blocksize 2MB? X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 07/10, lampahome wrote: > > > > I think so. You can check fibmap to see the block addresses. :) > > > > Execuse me, I'm a new to f2fs, how to check fibmap? > You mean f2fs-tools? It's generic ioctl. hdparm --fibmap [file] Or, fibmap.f2fs [file] > > thanks _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel