From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2ABC433E4 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFCFA2076D; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lists.sourceforge.net header.i=@lists.sourceforge.net header.b="Stl4GYGX"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="Xx4YDX36"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="GCoxsNVM"; dkim=neutral (0-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="J+mnXJRV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CFCFA2076D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lists.sourceforge.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.sourceforge.net; s=beta; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc: Reply-To:From:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:To:Mime-Version:Message-Id:Date:Sender: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=/dAE8c1q8ieGkx5YJbfL+e0QH6BgjyBndIt7ziOk7aw=; b=Stl4GYGXP/LBlrXQ17FbWIIf5j LhW4VrPW4oLBaDWs4852mJBchqiMeoeDRlpL6dds+7mPtLt+k7sG159h8726akbpX+4/trKM8jxV/ XuEhQf5/rEl3HsFe0HPRR3/wbrMuZSrrOho/JK4eT2g+ERounzu0WGRm9nUpngv3GYzk=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwFZe-0003Mz-Cb; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:54:06 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <3xwIRXwYKABA8q9Eq9w44w1u.s42@flex--satyat.bounces.google.com>) id 1jwFZd-0003Ml-5J for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:54:05 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+7NEyAtngBQ+NtsVner/xkX+DqdKiAPFh6L75+tULz8=; b=Xx4YDX363qODnThygwyUl5+RGG TQN1H9bODJ65OM1lAtPUWmza9Y98Jg5Jp7wqQXbqyWaTigeJLj4/vSqU9Qadqt5GunPcnaqATQjU7 x6I/jbk8RFR82PlT9yGPtyF3AaCcu6i5PW4LRb1BotgqpiGRjxDVMqpIAXXUJQRffJAc=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Message-Id:Date:Sender: Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date :Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post: List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+7NEyAtngBQ+NtsVner/xkX+DqdKiAPFh6L75+tULz8=; b=G CoxsNVM/JnMOQibG4Bq5boO1NwpDORlS/nqY444/sqYhP2GZGAtjcDXUVoFqhP1+Hesrlp6fA5oa+ /npvfaTynCWmsB2idQNcYg5vsJsn87doGtK5yQy0UeYEE0kJ04jmDHhxPYGpOfeMr/5b50NTvhBTg rodGLL4kgFCtRqSU=; Received: from mail-pg1-f201.google.com ([209.85.215.201]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jwFZb-00BMQe-MA for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:54:05 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-f201.google.com with SMTP id x184so6840852pgb.7 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:54:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from:to:cc; bh=+7NEyAtngBQ+NtsVner/xkX+DqdKiAPFh6L75+tULz8=; b=J+mnXJRVYMafFS+o+P1bnt+16uWofUiyPCntsNg3XT8Ib1llpcyxPal6f8PIhCbEDg Bo3vrtVP+ewSO7mAdmr/5QJ9Q+8lznYArog6g6Yn/TfIOxtFnyBUbMMAwMzb387Hy+4n NQYc29hAipQB21eO+fNDCbt/nxbJdxHIpwdS6q5E+lrkLVzIPyKreakfHHlXU24OaGvS 3sXbnd44eyIaABhMDfgRBS8/v+RMqJjd4+Y7VXgScSnrFKX+q5auEO7ITSrLsysG3q8i cwejZgsFGxkO262PT1lH8HbVFmp3uClJ+EgYMnzYiw35fV3DZjxG3i2PWmg+wIKT4XiR t2Hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from:to:cc; bh=+7NEyAtngBQ+NtsVner/xkX+DqdKiAPFh6L75+tULz8=; b=Cwkn1n8GrGdNWSF7Fc7PuJ1RdnjPiOvkTTimO354IazeX53aZ7OU7Uv2Alw83hHc67 TaB7vxLaxoFFm1S+uhLa6aOJXaoflsOxte5+U1J9yCVY4//BFo4LlWiwXaHar6x5Ja/L q2Rd4nfi1jAATFNFnm+HUAEQ+Z/7ILEgNC2zx3Hwcqr/9XnIbNN2GfSnl/E2Xjsi4tuc bNVAbpWjNXux0lNrZL119OAOsIWmrtOizM88e+fI1vdbm/z4o99AzH6wXl4by88Yju9u UpyxQIuCwMAsC+BRA4d9g+Hc5mDWyM6K+UeHAEivTOfvM7cvDCPSZ4lCAZjcj4BY4Gcg XDXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532OplI2gayeY21OmD1Z3FiI42fe8/hXx4vMIICeBesMJR/Xa7xs Reb8ltDRH2AGBiykiQLqv9uph5qvmoc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyaOqu4ad+t9uE7Zf0fPE6MJrUBppYirFS0r4ZA4lohiyuJAJadPtXvIAZN/YC0+AHkJyLwA8Dg4AI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ed13:: with SMTP id b19mr5756330pld.294.1594950343440; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:45:33 +0000 Message-Id: <20200717014540.71515-1-satyat@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0.rc0.105.gf9edc3c819-goog To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org X-Headers-End: 1jwFZb-00BMQe-MA Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 0/7] add support for direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Satya Tangirala via Linux-f2fs-devel Reply-To: Satya Tangirala Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Satya Tangirala Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net This patch series adds support for direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto. It has been rebased on fscrypt/master. Patch 1 adds two functions to fscrypt that need to be called to determine if direct I/O is supported for a request. Patches 2 and 3 wire up direct-io and iomap respectively with the functions introduced in Patch 1 and set bio crypt contexts on bios when appropriate by calling into fscrypt. Patches 4 and 5 allow ext4 and f2fs direct I/O to support fscrypt without falling back to buffered I/O. Patches 6 and 7 update the fscrypt documentation for inline encryption support and direct I/O. The documentation now notes the required conditions for inline encryption and direct I/O on encrypted files. This patch series was tested by running xfstests with test_dummy_encryption with and without the 'inlinecrypt' mount option, and there were no meaningful regressions. One regression was for generic/587 on ext4, but that test isn't compatible with test_dummy_encryption in the first place, and the test "incorrectly" passes without the 'inlinecrypt' mount option - a patch will be sent out to exclude that test when test_dummy_encryption is turned on with ext4 (like the other quota related tests that use user visible quota files). The other regression was for generic/252 on ext4, which does direct I/O with a buffer aligned to the block device's blocksize, but not necessarily aligned to the filesystem's block size, which direct I/O with fscrypt requires. Changes v2 => v3: - add changelog to coverletter Changes v1 => v2: - Fix bug in f2fs caused by replacing f2fs_post_read_required() with !fscrypt_dio_supported() since the latter doesn't check for compressed inodes unlike the former. - Add patches 6 and 7 for fscrypt documentation - cleanups and comments Eric Biggers (5): fscrypt: Add functions for direct I/O support direct-io: add support for fscrypt using blk-crypto iomap: support direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto ext4: support direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto f2fs: support direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto Satya Tangirala (2): fscrypt: document inline encryption support fscrypt: update documentation for direct I/O support Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst | 36 +++++++++++- fs/crypto/crypto.c | 8 +++ fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/direct-io.c | 15 ++++- fs/ext4/file.c | 10 ++-- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 6 +- fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 8 +++ include/linux/fscrypt.h | 19 +++++++ 8 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.28.0.rc0.105.gf9edc3c819-goog _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel