From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5FAC433E1 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5D132074B; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lists.sourceforge.net header.i=@lists.sourceforge.net header.b="UkSpSe5R"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="XSzxpz/x"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="W8MHzJVc"; dkim=neutral (0-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="kiMq1ZWt" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A5D132074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lists.sourceforge.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.sourceforge.net; s=beta; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc: Reply-To:From:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:To:References:Mime-Version:Message-Id: In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=gp785tBYb1FNsQIBZ6rfiIDj5KgGfRjQwJHOqbOU8xs=; b=UkSpSe5RuFQb3op5VRq+pC5Se N0vP1Abq7jP9Ja9XGe9ijCOwBD7JVT7XOqmzSuFtp2eoSbTvKQBuOHPmDHT8sr+LEBzkMXLoeVZo5 mY0Qpbd3PoqwKrgMHPeu9bvcmlUQnQq0o073Fs0/f0Aj6uasEqAv1U52HVbqR+OjYxhWQ=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyx06-0006DU-EJ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:40:34 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <3D9AaXwYKABoI0JO0J6EE6B4.2EC@flex--satyat.bounces.google.com>) id 1jyx05-0006DJ-FH for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:40:33 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:From:Subject:References: Mime-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=U1mjdiTf1REytCgM0qXLRwHi12+4iLhjMHz6o0dObf4=; b=XSzxpz/x7Blgl+ntWDF0Zf5jK eZT+E+sTXPNsRun0lkdN1dIC2Si43tvUOMRfXhNqLpS/Nv0tTS3UEOOdffQiAsUUjGyffzvkt6p9Q PHFUzrGESY1e787o7kVaDXo+K39HbLl+38ayOhoysrGbzh3iFRGOhe9nvNuQg+86gG0G0=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:From:Subject:References:Mime-Version:Message-Id: In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=U1mjdiTf1REytCgM0qXLRwHi12+4iLhjMHz6o0dObf4=; b=W8MHzJVczpDLTL/NksP9AHUr7Y H+sSdT5gnJe+IsyUparuWO02KZnPaeCR3oYU/GrGNUfOiGrMvQYdqH+o3yqBrz4HT8pMoEme9fjvM zfManFo/SPdjT1fAcecL63KOFvOPq0Fwp8o59+jdeSqcTIiYTfWTc/hke4ZcWw+9jLas=; Received: from mail-pl1-f202.google.com ([209.85.214.202]) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jyx03-001Nwo-UF for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:40:33 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-f202.google.com with SMTP id y24so5348088plp.18 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:40:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=U1mjdiTf1REytCgM0qXLRwHi12+4iLhjMHz6o0dObf4=; b=kiMq1ZWtQnJd4reX4VWrcLsQOtCggJ6Lx8/zqeNQSzQ7hT54ehmC/vMQjFsmcj5Bzl vfX6LCyxcL40ZX02qaEmRhcqWquQZcpcm14ND8JtsyogdqAL+HsczyPTJ/86YKvMEITC a+14IVbSsKlMoJEklV7JAH9lru+zgeEFcHQouasVGEZpC36HAZ0A8fXzWaPHdHwwh531 3sgi8AC8myUTqxXOiGCGooXwGHlrL4xx7SKojIoIGoqgllfhRf7ZT072nwliYBJnNjsH kgVdv5uGrSMRIfdEbgA6jSqsd00RikhGl/OBLE9V+8itOqdO7bSHm0kJnSbdv6a48pA2 Wz1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=U1mjdiTf1REytCgM0qXLRwHi12+4iLhjMHz6o0dObf4=; b=VjfaHEn7rXBnaiv65g6/iEP4i/vp8zbjL8KRGOYMN+rQk6E9GlWEi+yW0A3XgnRz+8 yAMDVc1Yqce/RMvkVvHmo+xcudxnyeP2QKSdqwofLIbjDOzmBNmrUCNurZgKCFhijXpF fj2ZLeh8/fBJjmbj2JVRhOO+blNjm1dY4PUWSRTvdAvFnH9fPVhw+xwunOwINKT16sqr +3/YP70Dp30DBrRT3TsGvCHhFqyGM1FSf4B985XJ0ZDpTxoeY99gQjklyEkIioxMgTov y7UZQDJUEir0OgvzknVbpC2dMhzV67+ngIoRmeBR/IgNOcdLTnvNaFQUfSlwejoeotW8 QmUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322u7J4gXVg7BQQlM4EgqSPbFAvWaaALTOCEMaIDHujSdzcA8IX QlOvQMpXPB+SLEyJI1E4yjbUnmInF3Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJfhv4J/Z8dONpLYUW4MpGcI1VRHtlxbqb93pVNIkZdbpJQqFPedb6S47261MqborqJwQs/SHfE9o= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c389:: with SMTP id g9mr7645772plg.317.1595592719727; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:11:42 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20200724121143.1589121-1-satyat@google.com> Message-Id: <20200724121143.1589121-7-satyat@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20200724121143.1589121-1-satyat@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0.rc0.142.g3c755180ce-goog To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org X-Headers-End: 1jyx03-001Nwo-UF Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v5 6/7] fscrypt: document inline encryption support X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Satya Tangirala via Linux-f2fs-devel Reply-To: Satya Tangirala Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , Eric Biggers , Satya Tangirala Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Update the fscrypt documentation file for inline encryption support. Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst index f5d8b0303ddf..ec81598477fc 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst @@ -1204,6 +1204,18 @@ buffer. Some filesystems, such as UBIFS, already use temporary buffers regardless of encryption. Other filesystems, such as ext4 and F2FS, have to allocate bounce pages specially for encryption. +Fscrypt is also able to use inline encryption hardware instead of the +kernel crypto API for en/decryption of file contents. When possible, +and if directed to do so (by specifying the 'inlinecrypt' mount option +for an ext4/F2FS filesystem), it adds encryption contexts to bios and +uses blk-crypto to perform the en/decryption instead of making use of +the above read/write path changes. Of course, even if directed to +make use of inline encryption, fscrypt will only be able to do so if +either hardware inline encryption support is available for the +selected encryption algorithm or CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION_FALLBACK +is selected. If neither is the case, fscrypt will fall back to using +the above mentioned read/write path changes for en/decryption. + Filename hashing and encoding ----------------------------- @@ -1250,7 +1262,9 @@ Tests To test fscrypt, use xfstests, which is Linux's de facto standard filesystem test suite. First, run all the tests in the "encrypt" -group on the relevant filesystem(s). For example, to test ext4 and +group on the relevant filesystem(s). One can also run the tests +with the 'inlinecrypt' mount option to test the implementation for +inline encryption support. For example, to test ext4 and f2fs encryption using `kvm-xfstests `_:: -- 2.28.0.rc0.142.g3c755180ce-goog _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel