From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBB7C43461 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 04:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E5DA22205; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 04:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="evpX8Ww6"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="RC7k4wEP"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="KuwrpsyK" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8E5DA22205 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIlIp-0002xA-8q; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 04:13:47 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIlIc-0002vL-JH for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 04:13:34 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=EyjFKoST5U0kuWnqnUhGCsU4YqesdRAlUpxPIzb2lI0=; b=evpX8Ww6C2pgSPLLKrUGZgjUU4 pfUWyg4Y94yJAe9ZDmeT+KbUynKXc/UGATTYfnxSZLTfVOZ+NcGKk1XRpFPpvY3tF74ch0QnrbjR6 /nTcRRH/Qxi3SaWPJrYDhbzHROCDrhdOb8abrFuOqlDQQPZOss0ANby5bvmEqFoxAMOI=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id: Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=EyjFKoST5U0kuWnqnUhGCsU4YqesdRAlUpxPIzb2lI0=; b=RC7k4wEPod9JhqEud0SWJ/qBIH 1BGK+F0n6BNb+fVZcwK2ifYY21OUawaIjuiJbNHwDZ9D3GCaJo1zXoucS81tX2itKDCT7A+9rz+Wl 01oE2hW/TS2lUzRbVUqSwtWjio7cmuavLWmYzP46F4ySV05bho27vhx7gojut21Ro0/A=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kIlIY-00DZe7-Ar for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 04:13:34 +0000 Received: from sol.attlocal.net (172-10-235-113.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [172.10.235.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF604221E7; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 04:13:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600315990; bh=7wQf9Y1Ge/SR2fWtRDGBHBDQ9VcJIvgAiZJHiDlXVEw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KuwrpsyKR6Az33Os8au9dNORztVK5lPaO//5B4B9GGkqISAfjzCoMKvSaFMdYkK+H cTfwdylHR5zS/tWU4yj+Sm4uxrUgf/O1/jB19DUFCvaoNPk/KtcTePbae7Dup7hHHg AlchzaMoe4dDGfi2GfcedI9GWx9Qsvh1eLld4LG4= From: Eric Biggers To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 21:11:33 -0700 Message-Id: <20200917041136.178600-11-ebiggers@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20200917041136.178600-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> References: <20200917041136.178600-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Headers-End: 1kIlIY-00DZe7-Ar Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 10/13] fscrypt: make "#define fscrypt_policy" user-only X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Rosenberg , Jeff Layton , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net From: Eric Biggers The fscrypt UAPI header defines fscrypt_policy to fscrypt_policy_v1, for source compatibility with old userspace programs. Internally, the kernel doesn't want that compatibility definition. Instead, fscrypt_private.h #undefs it and re-defines it to a union. That works for now. However, in order to add fscrypt_operations::get_dummy_policy(), we'll need to forward declare 'union fscrypt_policy' in include/linux/fscrypt.h. That would cause build errors because "fscrypt_policy" is used in ioctl numbers. To avoid this, modify the UAPI header to make the fscrypt_policy compatibility definition conditional on !__KERNEL__, and make the ioctls use fscrypt_policy_v1 instead of fscrypt_policy. Note that this doesn't change the actual ioctl numbers. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers --- fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h | 1 - include/uapi/linux/fscrypt.h | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h index 355f6d9377517..ac3352086ee44 100644 --- a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h +++ b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ static inline const u8 *fscrypt_context_nonce(const union fscrypt_context *ctx) return NULL; } -#undef fscrypt_policy union fscrypt_policy { u8 version; struct fscrypt_policy_v1 v1; diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fscrypt.h b/include/uapi/linux/fscrypt.h index 7875709ccfebf..e5de603369381 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/fscrypt.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fscrypt.h @@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ struct fscrypt_policy_v1 { __u8 flags; __u8 master_key_descriptor[FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE]; }; -#define fscrypt_policy fscrypt_policy_v1 /* * Process-subscribed "logon" key description prefix and payload format. @@ -156,9 +155,9 @@ struct fscrypt_get_key_status_arg { __u32 __out_reserved[13]; }; -#define FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY _IOR('f', 19, struct fscrypt_policy) +#define FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY _IOR('f', 19, struct fscrypt_policy_v1) #define FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_PWSALT _IOW('f', 20, __u8[16]) -#define FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY _IOW('f', 21, struct fscrypt_policy) +#define FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY _IOW('f', 21, struct fscrypt_policy_v1) #define FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX _IOWR('f', 22, __u8[9]) /* size + version */ #define FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY _IOWR('f', 23, struct fscrypt_add_key_arg) #define FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY _IOWR('f', 24, struct fscrypt_remove_key_arg) @@ -170,6 +169,7 @@ struct fscrypt_get_key_status_arg { /* old names; don't add anything new here! */ #ifndef __KERNEL__ +#define fscrypt_policy fscrypt_policy_v1 #define FS_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE #define FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_4 FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_4 #define FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_8 FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_8 -- 2.28.0 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel