From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF06DC433E0 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 00:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC525206DA for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 00:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="QY5icZQI"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="fWCRftUh" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DC525206DA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2lGb-0005zO-6V; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 00:57:21 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2lGZ-0005zG-Ke for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 00:57:19 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=n4zejEUXrEkBoI8FqV0oFwpgV2rE+o1FnFdE9HswZZc=; b=QY5icZQIOy93aqKldGuDclM3Zz uSj8hMGUoSytQVobYKDRP9JVBqbsHaPEmtbkHkPr3BONDrTQczeDvpXmrNV9xcE6gdaV6l0fMOjwT +5bHqXEj3GLqG+BRANIX+90akZXW2BrIzzkBq11FKo2CYEwn4V0Ti21XVD7T5oZcRe+0=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=n4zejEUXrEkBoI8FqV0oFwpgV2rE+o1FnFdE9HswZZc=; b=fWCRftUhtSHxzKMzvv1YXcmzSI eiamNf0DJqwVmxvlxnoSwIJiczDRqK0G6VZcQirpoMYlcnPB3tjikt2a6TArCuYyth858o1gLXz73 Cp1KBGQFy8qWtm/tYxauBctXUZUN0gGSKBEUqqOUcqBpMrSWyheEPeiduo+DvVfvqGBQ=; Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1k2lGY-00BBlc-9U for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 00:57:19 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 73459B9F4BC73A91C11D; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:57:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.164.122.247] (10.164.122.247) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:56:56 +0800 To: Yufen Yu , , References: <20200731061813.3791834-1-yuyufen@huawei.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <3070f5af-1899-fc31-e2ba-9f333ce73a2b@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:56:56 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200731061813.3791834-1-yuyufen@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.164.122.247] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1k2lGY-00BBlc-9U Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: replace test_and_set/clear_bit() with set/clear_bit() X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2020/7/31 14:18, Yufen Yu wrote: > Since set/clear_inode_flag() don't need to return value to show > if flag is set, we can just call set/clear_bit() here. > > Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel