From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8090AC433E2 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FB5220704 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="QR8edrb+"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="lT0skUJB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4FB5220704 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwK0a-0007hB-RT; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:38:12 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwK0Y-0007h3-Oy for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:38:10 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=atK9D8LhYLV4Ftvsl0vr5zIzirVCryGaPW5iZQyFHzg=; b=QR8edrb+DQMLBSAMeVKmtM/SEd Ry2u9RPUcQXLRZpDFi+AQlGbIhc2jeRrB6w97F2/pO+mY1epbHXYltPcLrO5KQbERpeJ9XCHUrzcl kA83S/xGxameM0MBW7hi+vE6lRDzkq83NpeA8JpE4XHEp6e2oQ7UPlnFgkas36pw8xME=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=atK9D8LhYLV4Ftvsl0vr5zIzirVCryGaPW5iZQyFHzg=; b=lT0skUJB1KyuOEQZueJkS1en1q 0mYOoylmaplNH0D1H7AMggFbcb3CnmvJ1/P54w2cbrhhjItfG74XUXJQ2+IYphU2WGG/jhzBYtrxq uyPVuROVrmp1TZ7RyMeyu8/eXkNcH4vSdYyyzquLjRlF6eUqdiirQGRQRTm87PbWoZrc=; Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jwK0W-0071Fv-Ns for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:38:10 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id A7FF6FE8DF5955B5C66F; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:37:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:37:53 +0800 To: Eric Biggers , , Jaegeuk Kim , Chao Yu References: <20200714221812.43464-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <40b6e371-e170-88bb-4644-1552e5544175@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:37:52 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200714221812.43464-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1jwK0W-0071Fv-Ns Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use generic names for generic ioctls X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Jiaheng Hu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2020/7/15 6:18, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers > > Don't define F2FS_IOC_* aliases to ioctls that already have a generic > FS_IOC_* name. These aliases are unnecessary, and they make it unclear > which ioctls are f2fs-specific and which are generic. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel