linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: avoid unneeded barrier in do_checkpoint()
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:18:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <576f8389-ba27-b461-5466-cc62e84b5c92@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200219025154.GB96609@google.com>

On 2020/2/19 10:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 02/18, Chao Yu wrote:
>> We don't need to wait all dirty page submitting IO twice,
>> remove unneeded wait step.
> 
> What happens if checkpoint and other meta writs are reordered?

checkpoint can be done as following:

1. All meta except last cp-park of checkpoint area.
2. last cp-park of checkpoint area

So we only need to keep barrier in between step 1 and 2, we don't need
to care about the write order of meta in step 1, right?

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 --
>>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> index 751815cb4c2b..9c88fb3d255a 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> @@ -1384,8 +1384,6 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>  
>>  	/* Flush all the NAT/SIT pages */
>>  	f2fs_sync_meta_pages(sbi, META, LONG_MAX, FS_CP_META_IO);
>> -	/* Wait for all dirty meta pages to be submitted for IO */
>> -	f2fs_wait_on_all_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * modify checkpoint
>> -- 
>> 2.18.0.rc1
> .
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-19  3:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-18 10:21 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: avoid __GFP_NOFAIL in f2fs_bio_alloc Chao Yu
2020-02-18 10:21 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: fix to avoid triggering IO in write path Chao Yu
2020-02-18 10:21 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: avoid unneeded barrier in do_checkpoint() Chao Yu
2020-02-19  2:51   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-02-19  3:18     ` Chao Yu [this message]
2020-02-24 22:00       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-02-25  6:10         ` Chao Yu
2020-02-19  2:49 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: avoid __GFP_NOFAIL in f2fs_bio_alloc Jaegeuk Kim
2020-02-19  3:12   ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=576f8389-ba27-b461-5466-cc62e84b5c92@huawei.com \
    --to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).