From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7E0C32771 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB6C120848; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="ODxepiq+"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="IE02E72j" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EB6C120848 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioOGN-0006zF-Fp; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:01:27 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioOGJ-0006yx-DS for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:01:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:References:CC:To:From:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=i7yHTDAwaHMQt4FkbjLfUviDvwbRl10G8DIaos8ZRpU=; b=ODxepiq+n/+QzYfOHh0Wwd//B4 j3VvSuH+RWFUhYL5vEfDbbP/57So4JFii5Mcz9ahF3ayoKgbV/G8LO3VxEj3o/c+dtLfCTSjQxG1g 6KBDiEbRyfOgl6p/wU5y5clTLWqUtMvJRP0Pj5FlZJpjr0Dy5VX+izXS/MxDuyXHEH2g=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:References:CC:To:From:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=i7yHTDAwaHMQt4FkbjLfUviDvwbRl10G8DIaos8ZRpU=; b=IE02E72jhnSjo0IGJC3r6hA0kK i96Ukv+QKdcFXkoLviiRP+vtJUjPU9OQY181+t3kzhHap527ldKnGoEsL9CzMsI7Jp7ge93p+oz7c V8nUYc2tJsqroEjcNcF/pGlEhVTM/BGJgAQp6oSHkIk9qnzRHNXU5Fy5WvNwqLh3yIuc=; Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1ioOGF-00Bdb2-G9 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:01:21 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 78F401989D9DF3C45777; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 17:01:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 17:01:10 +0800 From: Chao Yu To: Jaegeuk Kim References: <20191216062806.112361-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> <20191218214619.GA20072@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <20191231004633.GA85441@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <7a579223-39d4-7e51-c361-4aa592b2500d@huawei.com> <20200102181832.GA1953@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <20200102190003.GA7597@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> Message-ID: <94786408-219d-c343-70f2-70a2cc68dd38@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 17:01:10 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1ioOGF-00Bdb2-G9 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v5] f2fs: support data compression X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2020/1/3 14:50, Chao Yu wrote: > This works to me. Could you run fsstress tests on compressed root directory? > It seems still there are some bugs. Jaegeuk, Did you mean running por_fsstress testcase? Now, at least I didn't hit any problem for normal fsstress case. Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel