From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9453C43603 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 06:22:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A65EF206E0; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 06:22:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="Egk2pZln"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="WxvPk/86" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A65EF206E0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ieYux-0007kK-7v; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 06:22:43 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ieYuv-0007k6-8j for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 06:22:41 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=p26hVEw1nhQ9d80CN3GI6bhuvcByOz1xXjU82RwSCuw=; b=Egk2pZlnjCPqR5w9KmTVemNaRm KRGc0r9Y/zAbEeMYi5aQBREuhiamMOdp989pJD0qznM3k/Qcf1x8XWStFxYyrtsEzzOhRcNUbcyvT jah8B22gj9JFEgiIgWcMGBqf7EdtTEre/Who1Az4O4WTYmtebb3VO8Wu7IchWJZoZ/cs=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=p26hVEw1nhQ9d80CN3GI6bhuvcByOz1xXjU82RwSCuw=; b=WxvPk/86vxvTRRUUX1tZysjU+J jFyc/ucW+7UWN/ctyIj+2G9DpnlDCkdvfcZjKSEn8xfX6Rof1oGlkQF6SnyxKtyNJocl0ydQ+QQG0 SDgm284pduaUdva2N8tfaqfxJJOPJfNE6KIWrMYiu3gPJt8ONY1oLmoLUsc8C1B/Xfec=; Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1ieYuo-00G8ys-FR for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 06:22:35 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 6B85ACFE8E93AAAE193A; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:22:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:22:26 +0800 To: Jaegeuk Kim , , References: <20191209222345.1078-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20191209222345.1078-4-jaegeuk@kernel.org> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <9dd3df66-63ec-0ccf-55c7-85c479819601@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:22:26 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191209222345.1078-4-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1ieYuo-00G8ys-FR Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: should avoid recursive filesystem ops X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2019/12/10 6:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > We need to use GFP_NOFS, since we did f2fs_lock_op(). > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel