From: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: rename checkpoint=merge mount option to checkpoint_merge
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 17:02:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACOAw_wGY1CNXZ9QoLB1t0800Wyjv1_P9iuqk4SOKjT-oUQamw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef27f0cc-87b6-cea1-31a6-f2837d6a673c@huawei.com>
I chose the same step with "flush_merge", because it doesn't have
"noflush_merge".
Do you think we need that for both, "noflush_merge" and "nocheckpoint_merge"?
I thought we needed to give some time to make this be turned on by
default. It might be a little radical. :)
What do you think?
2021년 2월 2일 (화) 오후 4:40, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>님이 작성:
>
> On 2021/2/2 13:18, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
> >
> > As checkpoint=merge comes in, mount option setting related to checkpoint
> > had been mixed up and it became hard to understand. So, I separated
> > this option from "checkpoint=" and made another mount option
> > "checkpoint_merge" for this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
> > ---
> > v2: renamed "checkpoint=merge" to "checkpoint_merge"
> > ---
> > Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst | 6 +++---
> > fs/f2fs/super.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst
> > index d0ead45dc706..475994ed8b15 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst
> > @@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ checkpoint=%s[:%u[%]] Set to "disable" to turn off checkpointing. Set to "enabl
> > hide up to all remaining free space. The actual space that
> > would be unusable can be viewed at /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/unusable
> > This space is reclaimed once checkpoint=enable.
> > - Here is another option "merge", which creates a kernel daemon
> > - and makes it to merge concurrent checkpoint requests as much
> > - as possible to eliminate redundant checkpoint issues. Plus,
> > +checkpoint_merge When checkpoint is enabled, this can be used to create a kernel
> > + daemon and make it to merge concurrent checkpoint requests as
> > + much as possible to eliminate redundant checkpoint issues. Plus,
> > we can eliminate the sluggish issue caused by slow checkpoint
> > operation when the checkpoint is done in a process context in
> > a cgroup having low i/o budget and cpu shares. To make this
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index 56696f6cfa86..d8603e6c4916 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ enum {
> > Opt_checkpoint_disable_cap_perc,
> > Opt_checkpoint_enable,
> > Opt_checkpoint_merge,
> > + Opt_nocheckpoint_merge,
> > Opt_compress_algorithm,
> > Opt_compress_log_size,
> > Opt_compress_extension,
> > @@ -215,7 +216,8 @@ static match_table_t f2fs_tokens = {
> > {Opt_checkpoint_disable_cap, "checkpoint=disable:%u"},
> > {Opt_checkpoint_disable_cap_perc, "checkpoint=disable:%u%%"},
> > {Opt_checkpoint_enable, "checkpoint=enable"},
> > - {Opt_checkpoint_merge, "checkpoint=merge"},
> > + {Opt_checkpoint_merge, "checkpoint_merge"},
> > + {Opt_nocheckpoint_merge, "nocheckpoint_merge"},
> > {Opt_compress_algorithm, "compress_algorithm=%s"},
> > {Opt_compress_log_size, "compress_log_size=%u"},
> > {Opt_compress_extension, "compress_extension=%s"},
> > @@ -946,6 +948,9 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options, bool is_remount)
> > case Opt_checkpoint_merge:
> > set_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
> > break;
> > + case Opt_nocheckpoint_merge:
> > + clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
> > + break;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION
> > case Opt_compress_algorithm:
> > if (!f2fs_sb_has_compression(sbi)) {
> > @@ -1142,12 +1147,6 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options, bool is_remount)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > - if (test_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT) &&
> > - test_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT)) {
> > - f2fs_err(sbi, "checkpoint=merge cannot be used with checkpoint=disable\n");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > -
> > /* Not pass down write hints if the number of active logs is lesser
> > * than NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE.
> > */
> > @@ -1782,7 +1781,7 @@ static int f2fs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root)
> > seq_printf(seq, ",checkpoint=disable:%u",
> > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap);
> > if (test_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT))
> > - seq_puts(seq, ",checkpoint=merge");
> > + seq_puts(seq, ",checkpoint_merge");
>
> Other noxxx options will be shown in show_options(), how about following them?
>
> > if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fsync_mode == FSYNC_MODE_POSIX)
> > seq_printf(seq, ",fsync_mode=%s", "posix");
> > else if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fsync_mode == FSYNC_MODE_STRICT)
> > @@ -1827,6 +1826,7 @@ static void default_options(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > sbi->sb->s_flags |= SB_LAZYTIME;
> > set_opt(sbi, FLUSH_MERGE);
> > set_opt(sbi, DISCARD);
> > + clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
>
> Why should we clear checkpoint_merge option in default_options()?
>
> Thanks,
>
> > if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi))
> > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode = FS_MODE_LFS;
> > else
> > @@ -2066,9 +2066,8 @@ static int f2fs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - if (!test_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT)) {
> > - f2fs_stop_ckpt_thread(sbi);
> > - } else {
> > + if (!test_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT) &&
> > + test_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT)) {
> > err = f2fs_start_ckpt_thread(sbi);
> > if (err) {
> > f2fs_err(sbi,
> > @@ -2076,6 +2075,8 @@ static int f2fs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
> > err);
> > goto restore_gc;
> > }
> > + } else {
> > + f2fs_stop_ckpt_thread(sbi);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -3831,7 +3832,8 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> >
> > /* setup checkpoint request control and start checkpoint issue thread */
> > f2fs_init_ckpt_req_control(sbi);
> > - if (test_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT)) {
> > + if (!test_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT) &&
> > + test_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT)) {
> > err = f2fs_start_ckpt_thread(sbi);
> > if (err) {
> > f2fs_err(sbi,
> >
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-02 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-02 5:18 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: rename checkpoint=merge mount option to checkpoint_merge Daeho Jeong
2021-02-02 5:33 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-02-02 7:40 ` Chao Yu
2021-02-02 8:02 ` Daeho Jeong [this message]
2021-02-02 8:30 ` Chao Yu
2021-02-02 9:07 ` Daeho Jeong
2021-02-02 9:13 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACOAw_wGY1CNXZ9QoLB1t0800Wyjv1_P9iuqk4SOKjT-oUQamw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daeho43@gmail.com \
--cc=daehojeong@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).