linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "常凤楠 via Linux-f2fs-devel" <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>, "jaegeuk@kernel.org" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] f2fs: fix missing inplace count in overwrite with direct io
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:45:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <KL1PR0601MB400388BC823D5FD0558D43D2BBDC9@KL1PR0601MB4003.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AFQA*QDoEjqpHYJlWwMYT4qj.9.1631794201010.Hmail.changfengnan@vivo.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: changfengnan@vivo.com <changfengnan@vivo.com> On Behalf Of
> Chao Yu
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 8:10 PM
> To: 常凤楠 <changfengnan@vivo.com>; jaegeuk@kernel.org
> Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] f2fs: fix missing inplace count in overwrite with
> direct io
> 
> On 2021/9/16 19:30, Fengnan Chang wrote:
> > For now, overwrite file with direct io use inplace policy, but not
> > counted, fix it. And use stat_add_inplace_blocks(sbi, 1, ) instead of
> > stat_inc_inplace_blocks(sb, ).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fengnan Chang <changfengnan@vivo.com>
> > ---
> >   fs/f2fs/data.c    | 7 ++++++-
> >   fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    | 8 ++++----
> >   fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
> >   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c index
> > c1490b9a1345..0c5728d63c33 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -1491,6 +1491,9 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct
> f2fs_map_blocks *map,
> >   		if (flag == F2FS_GET_BLOCK_DIO)
> >   			f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback_range(inode,
> >   						map->m_pblk, map->m_len);
> > +		if (!f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi) && flag == F2FS_GET_BLOCK_DIO &&
> > +				map->m_may_create)
> > +			stat_add_inplace_blocks(sbi, map->m_len, true);
> >   		goto out;
> >   	}
> >
> > @@ -1553,7 +1556,9 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct
> f2fs_map_blocks *map,
> >   				goto sync_out;
> >   			blkaddr = dn.data_blkaddr;
> >   			set_inode_flag(inode, FI_APPEND_WRITE);
> > -		}
> > +		} else if (!create && !f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi) && flag ==
> F2FS_GET_BLOCK_DIO &&
> > +				map->m_may_create)
> 
> Why not
> 
> } else if {!f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi) && flag == F2FS_GET_BLOCK_DIO &&
> 					map->m_may_create)
> 

You are right, no need to check create.

Thanks.
> Thanks,
> 
> > +			stat_add_inplace_blocks(sbi, 1, true);
> >   	} else {
> >   		if (create) {
> >   			if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) { diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index 3d4ee444db27..2d81e9f0a0ee 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -3785,12 +3785,12 @@ static inline struct f2fs_stat_info
> *F2FS_STAT(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >   		else								\
> >   			((sbi)->block_count[1][(curseg)->alloc_type]++);	\
> >   	} while (0)
> > -#define stat_inc_inplace_blocks(sbi, direct_io)					\
> > +#define stat_add_inplace_blocks(sbi, count, direct_io)			\
> >   	do {								\
> >   		if (direct_io)						\
> > -			(atomic_inc(&(sbi)->inplace_count[0]));		\
> > +			(atomic_add(count, &(sbi)->inplace_count[0]));  \
> >   		else								\
> > -			(atomic_inc(&(sbi)->inplace_count[1]));		\
> > +			(atomic_add(count, &(sbi)->inplace_count[1]));	\
> >   	} while (0)
> >   #define stat_update_max_atomic_write(inode)				\
> >   	do {								\
> > @@ -3877,7 +3877,7 @@ void f2fs_update_sit_info(struct f2fs_sb_info
> *sbi);
> >   #define stat_inc_meta_count(sbi, blkaddr)		do { } while (0)
> >   #define stat_inc_seg_type(sbi, curseg)			do { } while (0)
> >   #define stat_inc_block_count(sbi, curseg)		do { } while (0)
> > -#define stat_inc_inplace_blocks(sbi)			do { } while (0)
> > +#define stat_add_inplace_blocks(sbi, count, direct_io)		do { } while
> (0)
> >   #define stat_inc_seg_count(sbi, type, gc_type)		do { } while (0)
> >   #define stat_inc_tot_blk_count(si, blks)		do { } while (0)
> >   #define stat_inc_data_blk_count(sbi, blks, gc_type)	do { } while (0)
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index
> > ded744e880d0..c542c4b687ca 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -3611,7 +3611,7 @@ int f2fs_inplace_write_data(struct f2fs_io_info
> *fio)
> >   		goto drop_bio;
> >   	}
> >
> > -	stat_inc_inplace_blocks(fio->sbi, false);
> > +	stat_add_inplace_blocks(sbi, 1, false);
> >
> >   	if (fio->bio && !(SM_I(sbi)->ipu_policy & (1 << F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE)))
> >   		err = f2fs_merge_page_bio(fio);
> >

_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-16 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-16 11:30 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: separate buffer and direct io in block allocation statistics Fengnan Chang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2021-09-16 11:30 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] f2fs: fix missing inplace count in overwrite with direct io Fengnan Chang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2021-09-16 12:09   ` Chao Yu
     [not found]   ` <AFQA*QDoEjqpHYJlWwMYT4qj.9.1631794201010.Hmail.changfengnan@vivo.com>
2021-09-16 12:45     ` 常凤楠 via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2021-09-17 10:19       ` 常凤楠 via Linux-f2fs-devel
2021-09-17 12:59         ` Chao Yu
     [not found]         ` <ANgA6QClEsWrpLTMx5-VNqof.9.1631883577159.Hmail.changfengnan@vivo.com>
2021-09-18  6:46           ` 常凤楠 via Linux-f2fs-devel
2021-09-18 22:34             ` Chao Yu
     [not found]             ` <AJQA4AArEnKurlijneb9sapU.9.1632004451993.Hmail.changfengnan@vivo.com>
2021-09-22  3:01               ` 常凤楠 via Linux-f2fs-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=KL1PR0601MB400388BC823D5FD0558D43D2BBDC9@KL1PR0601MB4003.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=changfengnan@vivo.com \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).