From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CC5C43463 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 07:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD0FD20DD4; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 07:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="lt39D6vq"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="JNXdhM8Z" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AD0FD20DD4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJXCF-0006Yr-M7; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 07:22:11 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJXCE-0006Ye-B8 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 07:22:10 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fxXV5cqJfyJ64KTGk4DJ82zis229gOJ+GnoVlyCqnOk=; b=lt39D6vqzTbz9L9q0NoVPUDXEH wSmzhCeIm0/491sxHAPiwdW+4nIIYg8Ty+lGNKtQbLfAoJMfjiFJXqkmxfqnS83pJ04oHXKAOUwmK o2BaI34Ey1qsxT1H1TE0suRtqKPWiju1v5nVCDhrxm6Nn1Rg/St8S3RnUjRfpT959Z1g=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fxXV5cqJfyJ64KTGk4DJ82zis229gOJ+GnoVlyCqnOk=; b=JNXdhM8ZRL8dZBzZaAOPGn7c2X TYskJ8iK6Qoqto+dmF5IavTCXSxODDO5V/EJgeoF7vkGEGuB8M23ICshR+1llxgO+x3gG8oW4N0hY 3CGiFRQ52aVfkL2RYxwLVnE/vSifsT7tNg2quhWlgwi8t6E3uFY/9k3nm9333X0r5GjA=; Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kJXCA-00GVjn-3F for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 07:22:10 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id F10D5A12A49199817BE7; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:21:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.114.67] (10.136.114.67) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:21:34 +0800 To: Wang Xiaojun , , References: <20200918003124.1222353-1-wangxiaojun11@huawei.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:21:34 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200918003124.1222353-1-wangxiaojun11@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.136.114.67] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1kJXCA-00GVjn-3F Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove duplicated code in sanity_check_area_boundary X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2020/9/18 8:31, Wang Xiaojun wrote: > Use seg_end_blkaddr instead of "segment0_blkaddr + (segment_count << > log_blocks_per_seg)". > > Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaojun Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel