From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6783CC433E2 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B61120771; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="YmCw8E7K"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="XSkbcMZk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6B61120771 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHjL5-0003ly-Ek; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:55:51 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHjL3-0003jZ-TZ for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:55:49 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=b3lB7TQSOqy0Xs9QDY0d+6aujIbLX9XAjX0YRLVsatI=; b=YmCw8E7KLhwOa+vrX31D8NJztR i2e23Sj6rh8Ro3kglwpD3N1I8JF5XvSL1G4RMIruLmbBZYe8L37Af2xaNivByk/keUuUqs4Yrx2Ea DJ/GlFZjVT64zE6oNv7XgfaOS+niUy6OHotRXi0FKK26+peqZYI7KC8SdIhjY0plc1fk=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=b3lB7TQSOqy0Xs9QDY0d+6aujIbLX9XAjX0YRLVsatI=; b=XSkbcMZk4eVuCJlM8S5KBVZFog hLbq1OwNtKxgdhUX7anaSGasqYWxqkjmrYFLeyHaPD+sj5kGo6ocIxYGk4fv1zff3+HAYs5AFdk1a 5SG/BzZ3nODdO4aZlvr2EOY+2ySMNdrQ56/FZwy2sht+Q9EFHUYtgHGU0QhtfCqIvVNY=; Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kHjKr-0085SZ-5w for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:55:49 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8D3E6F709A543903ECA0; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:55:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.114.67] (10.136.114.67) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:55:15 +0800 To: Chris Ruehl , References: <284f77a4-9e6f-ebd7-1f35-4e907cc590ca@huawei.com> <7ba740b2-76c5-b92a-37a5-c7641d9c7474@gtsys.com.hk> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:55:15 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7ba740b2-76c5-b92a-37a5-c7641d9c7474@gtsys.com.hk> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.136.114.67] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1kHjKr-0085SZ-5w Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] F2fs failed on fresh installation 1st boot X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Chris, On 2020/9/14 15:38, Chris Ruehl wrote: > I must say sorry for the noise, I checked the Ram and CPU, we have a bad > RAM which can't follow the 992Mhz and causes the problem, once limit the > CPU speed to 800Mhz the problem is gone. Both 4.9 & 5.4 Okay, out of curiosity, the frequency 992Mhz has exceed the frequency limitation of RAM? > > Please consider this bug as false-positive. Alright, let us know if you have any issue on f2fs use. Thanks, > > > Regards > Chris > . > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel