From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [Bug 208565] There may be dead lock for cp_rwsem during checkpoint
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 02:47:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-208565-202145-nEnGFv5HkC@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-208565-202145@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208565
--- Comment #5 from Zhiguo.Niu (Zhiguo.Niu@unisoc.com) ---
(In reply to Jaegeuk Kim from comment #1)
> Thank you for the report.
>
> I think this is valid point that we need to fix.
> I'm testing a RFC patch like this. Thanks.
>
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1926,8 +1926,12 @@ int f2fs_sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> goto continue_unlock;
> }
>
> - /* flush inline_data, if it's async context. */
> - if (do_balance && is_inline_node(page)) {
> + /* flush inline_data/inode, if it's async context. */
> + if (!do_balance)
> + goto write_node;
> +
> + /* flush inline_data */
> + if (is_inline_node(page)) {
> clear_inline_node(page);
> unlock_page(page);
> flush_inline_data(sbi, ino_of_node(page));
> @@ -1940,7 +1944,7 @@ int f2fs_sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> if (flush_dirty_inode(page))
> goto lock_node;
> }
> -
> +write_node:
> f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(page, NODE, true, true);
>
> if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
Hi Jaegeuk Kim
for comment 1, can you help provide a full diff for this patch, I can not apply
it directly because of the following error:
> fatal: patch fragment without header at line 3: @@ -1926,8 +1926,12 @@ int
> f2fs_sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
or Should I merge it by Manually?
thanks a lot~
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-17 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-15 12:24 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 208565] New: There may be dead lock for cp_rwsem during checkpoint bugzilla-daemon
2020-07-16 17:15 ` [f2fs-dev] [Bug 208565] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-07-24 1:31 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-17 1:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-07-17 2:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-07-17 2:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-07-17 6:16 ` [f2fs-dev] Fwd: " Chao Yu
2020-07-17 2:47 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2020-07-23 7:11 ` [f2fs-dev] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-07-24 1:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-07-24 3:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-07-24 3:38 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-24 3:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-07-24 3:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-07-24 6:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-07-24 17:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-09-27 0:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-09-27 0:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-208565-202145-nEnGFv5HkC@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).