From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2D2C433FF for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CBAE216C8 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="jbkf6TTB"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="KR2Alikl" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6CBAE216C8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hslRe-0001er-3T; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:02:54 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hslRd-0001ee-0T for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:02:53 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Hhgh1UGj5kHMNekfOT/cu6/ePyca45b8T7lovbseKIk=; b=jbkf6TTB6uSK63M+dN4MP9MFQj w8EV1h4BOtvE+fyoj+1sPpRAMDJDdptt8/v/b2xpMsLAepWj5jIMhvoEsfD+tEQKaZZundF6mQ4wd iC9EVUazPzoUOqqpD45Ujvs6SyKZi0FvdArj4IN7UkguCddEDhjAn69tr3q5CNVk5ezY=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Hhgh1UGj5kHMNekfOT/cu6/ePyca45b8T7lovbseKIk=; b=KR2AliklZde9GflzdsI/wNsLhf RhxL0IPAl40aX0JlzvDEztFMJC0rm8lQtbBQ/kvv8rYbhQAFn3R3nozdks4ibIjE+r1AZ2ejWBysN RvN3w3388rmGngQlRWzoxn6SVOWmQMeFmDyyD93FdodtKhwQ4xya1/7+cdz0noZjkNHo=; Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1hslRb-005Z8m-0b for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:02:52 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 9B326B11197D3251F626; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 18:02:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 18:02:40 +0800 To: Jaegeuk Kim , Chao Yu References: <20190729150351.12223-1-chao@kernel.org> <20190730231850.GA7097@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 18:02:40 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190730231850.GA7097@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1hslRb-005Z8m-0b Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 RESEND] f2fs: introduce sb.required_features to store incompatible features X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2019/7/31 7:18, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 07/29, Chao Yu wrote: >> From: Chao Yu >> >> Later after this patch was merged, all new incompatible feature's >> bit should be added into sb.required_features field, and define new >> feature function with F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE_FUNCS() macro. >> >> Then during mount, we will do sanity check with enabled features in >> image, if there are features in sb.required_features that kernel can >> not recognize, just fail the mount. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu >> --- >> v3: >> - change commit title. >> - fix wrong macro name. >> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ >> fs/f2fs/super.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> include/linux/f2fs_fs.h | 3 ++- >> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >> index a6eb828af57f..b8e17d4ddb8d 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >> @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ struct f2fs_mount_info { >> #define F2FS_CLEAR_FEATURE(sbi, mask) \ >> (sbi->raw_super->feature &= ~cpu_to_le32(mask)) >> >> +#define F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES 0 >> + >> +#define F2FS_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, mask) \ >> + ((sbi->raw_super->required_features & cpu_to_le32(mask)) != 0) >> +#define F2FS_SET_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, mask) \ >> + (sbi->raw_super->required_features |= cpu_to_le32(mask)) >> +#define F2FS_CLEAR_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, mask) \ >> + (sbi->raw_super->required_features &= ~cpu_to_le32(mask)) >> + >> /* >> * Default values for user and/or group using reserved blocks >> */ >> @@ -3585,6 +3594,12 @@ F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(lost_found, LOST_FOUND); >> F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(sb_chksum, SB_CHKSUM); >> F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(casefold, CASEFOLD); >> >> +#define F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE_FUNCS(name, flagname) \ >> +static inline int f2fs_sb_has_##name(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) \ >> +{ \ >> + return F2FS_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, F2FS_FEATURE_##flagname); \ >> +} >> + >> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED >> static inline bool f2fs_blkz_is_seq(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int devi, >> block_t blkaddr) >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c >> index 5540fee0fe3f..3701dcce90e6 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c >> @@ -2513,6 +2513,16 @@ static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> >> + /* check whether current kernel supports all features on image */ >> + if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->required_features) & > > ... > #define F2FS_FEATURE_VERITY 0x0400 /* reserved */ > ... > #define F2FS_FEATURE_CASEFOLD 0x1000 > #define F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT 0x1BFF > > if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->required_features) & ~F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT) { > ... > return -EINVAL; > } Um, I thought .required_features are used to store new feature flags from 0x0. All 'F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT' bits should be stored in sb.feature instead of sb.required_features, I'm confused... Thanks, > > >> + ~F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES) { >> + f2fs_info(sbi, "Unsupported feature: %x: supported: %x", >> + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->required_features) ^ >> + F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES, >> + F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> /* Check checksum_offset and crc in superblock */ >> if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM)) { >> crc_offset = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->checksum_offset); >> diff --git a/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h b/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h >> index a2b36b2e286f..4141be3f219c 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h >> +++ b/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h >> @@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ struct f2fs_super_block { >> __u8 hot_ext_count; /* # of hot file extension */ >> __le16 s_encoding; /* Filename charset encoding */ >> __le16 s_encoding_flags; /* Filename charset encoding flags */ >> - __u8 reserved[306]; /* valid reserved region */ >> + __le32 required_features; /* incompatible features to old kernel */ >> + __u8 reserved[302]; /* valid reserved region */ >> __le32 crc; /* checksum of superblock */ >> } __packed; >> >> -- >> 2.22.0 > . > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel