From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: move ioctl interface definitions to separated file
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:17:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7e47bac-16e6-2038-3eb3-0fdb787ce977@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201103032234.GB2875@sol.localdomain>
On 2020/11/3 11:22, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 02:21:31PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> +#define F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE _IOWR(F2FS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 9, \
>> + struct f2fs_move_range)
> [...]
>> +#define F2FS_IOC_GARBAGE_COLLECT_RANGE _IOW(F2FS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 11, \
>> + struct f2fs_gc_range)
> [...]
>> +
>> +struct f2fs_gc_range {
>> + __u32 sync;
>> + __u64 start;
>> + __u64 len;
>> +};
> [...]
>> +struct f2fs_move_range {
>> + __u32 dst_fd; /* destination fd */
>> + __u64 pos_in; /* start position in src_fd */
>> + __u64 pos_out; /* start position in dst_fd */
>> + __u64 len; /* size to move */
>> +};
>
> These two structs are weird because there is implicit padding between the __u32
> field and the following __u64 field on some 32-bit architectures (e.g. x86_32)
> but not others (e.g. arm32).
>
> But f2fs_compat_ioctl() doesn't handle these two ioctls specially, but rather
> just calls through to f2fs_ioctl(). That's wrong, and it means that
> F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE and F2FS_IOC_GARBAGE_COLLECT_RANGE won't work when called
> from an x86_32 binary on an x86_64 kernel.
Nice catch!
>
> So something needs to be fixed. I wonder if it's safe to just explicitly add
> the padding field after the fact. If no one is actually using these two ioctls
> in a case where both userspace and the kernel lack the implicit padding (e.g.,
> x86_32 userspace with x86_32 kernel), it should be fine...
IIRC, Jaegeuk added those interfaces, I hope it's not the requirement from other
f2fs userspace developers...if it is, there may be users.
I found one patch in ext4 which fixes the similar issue, I guess we can fix this
with the same way, thoughts?
commit 4d92dc0f00a775dc2e1267b0e00befb783902fe7
Author: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon May 17 06:00:00 2010 -0400
ext4: Fix compat EXT4_IOC_ADD_GROUP
struct ext4_new_group_input needs to be converted because u64 has
only 32-bit alignment on some 32-bit architectures, notably i386.
Thanks,
>
> - Eric
> .
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-03 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-02 6:21 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: move ioctl interface definitions to separated file Chao Yu
2020-11-03 3:22 ` Eric Biggers
2020-11-03 8:17 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2020-11-03 18:38 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7e47bac-16e6-2038-3eb3-0fdb787ce977@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).