linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix long latency due to discard during umount
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:20:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa7d88ee-01e2-e82c-6c79-f24b90fbd472@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1584011671-20939-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org>

On 2020/3/12 19:14, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> F2FS already has a default timeout of 5 secs for discards that
> can be issued during umount, but it can take more than the 5 sec
> timeout if the underlying UFS device queue is already full and there
> are no more available free tags to be used. In that case, submit_bio()
> will wait for the already queued discard requests to complete to get
> a free tag, which can potentially take way more than 5 sec.
> 
> Fix this by submitting the discard requests with REQ_NOWAIT
> flags during umount. This will return -EAGAIN for UFS queue/tag full
> scenario without waiting in the context of submit_bio(). The FS can
> then handle these requests by retrying again within the stipulated
> discard timeout period to avoid long latencies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index fb3e531..a06bbac 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1124,10 +1124,13 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  	struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
>  	struct list_head *wait_list = (dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_FSTRIM) ?
>  					&(dcc->fstrim_list) : &(dcc->wait_list);
> -	int flag = dpolicy->sync ? REQ_SYNC : 0;
> +	int flag;
>  	block_t lstart, start, len, total_len;
>  	int err = 0;
>  
> +	flag = dpolicy->sync ? REQ_SYNC : 0;
> +	flag |= dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_UMOUNT ? REQ_NOWAIT : 0;
> +
>  	if (dc->state != D_PREP)
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -1203,6 +1206,11 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  		bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_submit_discard_endio;
>  		bio->bi_opf |= flag;
>  		submit_bio(bio);
> +		if ((flag & REQ_NOWAIT) && (dc->error == -EAGAIN)) {

If we want to update dc->state, we need to cover it with dc->lock.

> +			dc->state = D_PREP;

BTW, one dc can be referenced by multiple bios, so dc->state could be updated to
D_DONE later by f2fs_submit_discard_endio(), however we just relocate it to
pending list... which is inconsistent status.

Thanks,

> +			err = dc->error;
> +			break;
> +		}
>  
>  		atomic_inc(&dcc->issued_discard);
>  
> @@ -1510,6 +1518,10 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  			}
>  
>  			__submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
> +			if (dc->error == -EAGAIN) {
> +				congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
> +				__relocate_discard_cmd(dcc, dc);
> +			}
>  
>  			if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
>  				break;
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-13  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1584011671-20939-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org>
2020-03-12 17:02 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix long latency due to discard during umount Jaegeuk Kim
     [not found]   ` <20200313012604.GI20234@codeaurora.org>
2020-03-13  1:45     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-03-13  5:12       ` Sahitya Tummala
2020-03-13 15:38         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-03-13  2:20 ` Chao Yu [this message]
     [not found]   ` <20200313033912.GJ20234@codeaurora.org>
2020-03-13  6:30     ` Chao Yu
     [not found]       ` <20200313110846.GL20234@codeaurora.org>
2020-03-16  0:52         ` Chao Yu
2020-03-16  3:52           ` Sahitya Tummala
     [not found] <1584506689-5041-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org>
2020-03-24  9:08 ` Chao Yu
2020-03-24  9:47   ` Chao Yu
2020-03-26  9:00 ` Chao Yu
2020-03-26 13:37   ` Sahitya Tummala
2020-03-27  1:51     ` Chao Yu
     [not found]       ` <20200327030542.GS20234@codeaurora.org>
2020-03-30  6:53         ` Sahitya Tummala
2020-03-30  8:38           ` Chao Yu
2020-03-30 10:16             ` Chao Yu
2020-03-30 10:51               ` Sahitya Tummala
2020-03-31  1:46                 ` Chao Yu
2020-03-31  3:10                   ` Sahitya Tummala
2020-03-31  3:50                     ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fa7d88ee-01e2-e82c-6c79-f24b90fbd472@huawei.com \
    --to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).