From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F06C433B4 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 19:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318FF61585 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 19:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232054AbhEKTMQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 15:12:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56856 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231439AbhEKTMQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 15:12:16 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc36.google.com (mail-oo1-xc36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FCAFC061574 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:11:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc36.google.com with SMTP id l25-20020a4a35190000b029020a54735152so463215ooa.4 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:11:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IFnrqDxgmbDsaVUtrV/oF1WpAJvkWaxKP9Bq2K33Wvo=; b=b09ytGyivhbI8K/zbZcp9sDKhGmjau2pkv/7ypBP4Mp/rl0wCKVXl3JpZuLmU/YOpp 2ZcXFsCdRAOVBfwYE/0j2kmsvLb44az0BQXzaAB4ZATnjMVIwwh4sVG1rwwqGZD42t/D Oux/pXwt6aTWiW+7uplshgZg7Bwd4csK1oJIo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IFnrqDxgmbDsaVUtrV/oF1WpAJvkWaxKP9Bq2K33Wvo=; b=nn3+098i1O7u9rq9igjubXwvXdiFsO8xnuTY3+a7URGQidulfCWE+uuvVJGyqjz0Qb BTJuQlzSgVgMp0fEqVRkP1Ta4/yE8XJDUs3UkEYGqStNFAaaTBJe5201HAfBOFpPNf6/ jRSKy9xMDnrHeZKieLzU0xBCNhCcaDkIGcc8QN3PRGOip7/5qD0ItokF2hoQ6GD8mP9n qUaxa8ag84SulX8QRfz1oGzkRg/iQNusxYndvJj+9AuAZCS/uPqzAHVT+yroFEAoV8Pn fsQJnbTXORsynngDpW61EZzHldxuqu/A90OUpEzir+MNooZNui1henC4erN0FxZCDGuo mdgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+BY7rYVOs3KhIaX9xMjwteGkL7olN4zLdYMMDG6GVt3C/cKXY OMaeTaUHlm1aY+HCs4ZptG0pRD9fXt/N2Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/jlr8qg8GG0pOHutqmEOXU5XCJxQCt5kxsBR/CQ7TECykxqqSyXhPAhXefh68hWIgHjIRrw== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:e934:: with SMTP id a20mr24802030ooe.27.1620760268325; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:11:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ot1-f48.google.com (mail-ot1-f48.google.com. [209.85.210.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y191sm2496763oia.50.2021.05.11.12.11.07 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 May 2021 12:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-f48.google.com with SMTP id d3-20020a9d29030000b029027e8019067fso18404081otb.13 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:11:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1bd8:: with SMTP id v24mr27430126ota.203.1620760267068; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:11:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <57e9f582340545c79a9ab3433e2a4a7d@realtek.com> <87cztx87tr.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net> In-Reply-To: <87cztx87tr.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net> From: Brian Norris Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 12:10:55 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Request to update 8852a firmware of rtw89 to v0.13.8.0 To: Kalle Valo List-Id: Cc: Pkshih , "linux-firmware@kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20210511191055.Wrz2wnwchgquDK3oiFQgc17f4IY4cDxuQGe0QWNsC_4@z> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:05 AM Kalle Valo wrote: > > Pkshih writes: > > > Please help to update 8852a firmware. > > This is first time I send a pull request. If anything is wrong, please let me know. > > rtw89 driver is not in upstream yet, and it has not been reviewed > either. I recommend holding off pulling the firmware until the driver is > reviewed. FWIW, preliminary rtw89 firmware was already merged. This is just an update. I also wonder, what's the harm? People like me are actively testing the early versions, and I've done a very barebones amount of review (I hope to do more). It really helps me to have up-to-date firmware published somewhere central -- I guess I can take GitHub instead, but again, why not kernel.org? If anyone else is looking at testing, they know where to get the pieces too, and we can compare results. Brian