From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_PULL_REQUEST,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FDFC433ED for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) id 9F30B61185; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from so254-9.mailgun.net (so254-9.mailgun.net [198.61.254.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D647C61158 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:36:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D647C61158 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bounce+a91e02.be9e4a-linux-firmware=kernel.org@mg.codeaurora.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1619685371; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=XErExocfvzioA095Ye/csdwTGte0Z7OiMKiPrNLQVLI=; b=pIy/Lst2HPqhpvsNi6TmCHjzhn938GcUlC2/BlhlXTSPWAyc890zkg1iRamO8a+W5buDNPw2 XKavghPUYWr4/MaxctJTlatFD3KyWac1NKSCgIPKeAwVVrXJqZMGNvrN9QQr/pajBBfmdI8s Yej90ARQl/tGK0AwzKFKJzVi2G8= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.9 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3Mjk1MCIsICJsaW51eC1maXJtd2FyZUBrZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n02.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 608a6feea817abd39a9a55bc (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:35:58 GMT Sender: vgarodia=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3023AC433F1; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: vgarodia) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A4FFC433D3; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:35:56 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:05:56 +0530 From: vgarodia@codeaurora.org To: Stanimir Varbanov List-Id: Cc: smagar@codeaurora.org, linux-firmware@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@infradead.org, linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org, dikshita@codeaurora.org, adhudase@codeaurora.org, sampnimm@codeaurora.org, mansur@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: Update venus firmware files for v5.4 and venus firmware files for VPU-2.0 In-Reply-To: <9eaaec5d-a7d4-1889-5c92-28944b198adc@linaro.org> References: <9eaaec5d-a7d4-1889-5c92-28944b198adc@linaro.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: vgarodia@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 On 2021-04-28 19:18, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > On 4/28/21 3:32 PM, smagar@codeaurora.org wrote: >> Hello Team, >> >> Please include updated firmware bins for venus-5.4 and vpu-2.0. >> >> I have fixed comment and title updated. >> >> Removed 0 byte unwanted bins. >> >> Below is combined pull request for venus-5.4 and VPU-2.0. >> >> Please find snapshot of pull request, let me know if anything is >> missing. >> >> >> The following changes since commit >> 85286184d9df1b03bb76049edcfd87c39ce46e94: >> >>   Merge branch 'for-upstream' of >> git://git.chelsio.net/pub/git/linux-firmware into main (2021-04-19 >> 11:34:11 -0400) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >>   https://github.com/suraj714/linux-firmware-venus.git master >> >> for you to fetch changes up to >> 6cdef281cd16d967ad89c01af6fdda85529a2d80: >> >>   qcom: Add venus firmware files for VPU-2.0 (2021-04-28 14:42:48 >> +0530) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> smagar (2): >>       qcom: update venus firmware files for v5.4 >>       qcom: Add venus firmware files for VPU-2.0 >> >>  WHENCE                    |  34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>  qcom/venus-5.4/venus.b00  | Bin 212 -> 212 bytes >>  qcom/venus-5.4/venus.b01  | Bin 6808 -> 6808 bytes >>  qcom/venus-5.4/venus.b02  | Bin 873680 -> 873596 bytes >>  qcom/venus-5.4/venus.b03  | Bin 33792 -> 33792 bytes >>  qcom/venus-5.4/venus.mbn  | Bin 919792 -> 919708 bytes >>  qcom/venus-5.4/venus.mdt  | Bin 7020 -> 7020 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.b00 | Bin 0 -> 692 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.b01 | Bin 0 -> 7376 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.b02 | Bin 0 -> 300 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.b03 | Bin 0 -> 20 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.b04 | Bin 0 -> 20 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.b05 | Bin 0 -> 20 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.b06 | Bin 0 -> 20 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.b07 | Bin 0 -> 24 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.b08 | Bin 0 -> 16 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.b09 | Bin 0 -> 939184 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.b10 | Bin 0 -> 42976 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.b19 |   1 + >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.mbn | Bin 0 -> 2031188 bytes >>  qcom/vpu-2.0/vpu20_1v.mdt | Bin 0 -> 8068 bytes Suraj, lets make these as generic names venus.bxx. We could confirm on hardware with generic binary names. > > Which Venus IP/SoCs use vpu-2.0 firmware? And what is the difference > with existing vpu-1.0? This is for sc7280. vpu-1.0 and vpu-2.0 differs in hardware w.r.t number of hardware processing pipes. Thanks, Vikash