Re: [PATCH -next] fpga: dfl-pci: rectify ReST formatting

[Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>]

Hi Lukas,

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:21:13PM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> Commit fa41d10589be ("fpga: dfl-pci: locate DFLs by PCIe vendor specific
> capability") provides documentation to the FPGA Device Feature List (DFL)
Nit: Do you want to make this a Fixes: tag instead?
> Framework Overview, but introduced new documentation warnings:
> 
>   ./Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst:
>     505: WARNING: Title underline too short.
>     523: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
>     523: WARNING: Blank line required after table.
>     524: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> 
> Rectify ReST formatting in ./Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
> ---
> applies cleanly on next-20210111
> 
> Moritz, Matthew, please ack.
> 
> Greg, please pick this doc fixup to your fpga -next tree on top of
> the commit above.
> 
>  Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst b/Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst
> index ea8cefc18bdb..c41ac76ffaae 100644
> --- a/Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/fpga/dfl.rst
> @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ FME Partial Reconfiguration Sub Feature driver (see drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c)
>  could be a reference.
>  
>  Location of DFLs on a PCI Device
> -===========================
> +================================
>  The original method for finding a DFL on a PCI device assumed the start of the
>  first DFL to offset 0 of bar 0.  If the first node of the DFL is an FME,
>  then further DFLs in the port(s) are specified in FME header registers.
> @@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ data begins with a 4 byte vendor specific register for the number of DFLs follow
>  Offset/BIR vendor specific registers for each DFL. Bits 2:0 of Offset/BIR register
>  indicates the BAR, and bits 31:3 form the 8 byte aligned offset where bits 2:0 are
>  zero.
> +::
>  
>          +----------------------------+
>          |31     Number of DFLS      0|
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Thanks for doing this, I was about to send that same patch myself.

- Moritz