From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Cc: mdf@kernel.org, hao.wu@intel.com, michal.simek@xilinx.com,
nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com,
linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fpga: xilinx-pr-decoupler: remove unused xlnx_pr_decouple_read function
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 17:59:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBWLeC7UuDf+4dJE@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230317230617.1673923-1-trix@redhat.com>
On 2023-03-17 at 19:06:17 -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> clang with W=1 reports
> drivers/fpga/xilinx-pr-decoupler.c:37:19: error: unused function 'xlnx_pr_decouple_read' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> static inline u32 xlnx_pr_decouple_read(const struct xlnx_pr_decoupler_data *d,
> ^
> This static function is not used, so remove it.
I prefer to move the description as the first section. If you agree, I
could do it before apply.
Acked-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/xilinx-pr-decoupler.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/xilinx-pr-decoupler.c b/drivers/fpga/xilinx-pr-decoupler.c
> index 2d9c491f7be9..b6f18c07c752 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/xilinx-pr-decoupler.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/xilinx-pr-decoupler.c
> @@ -34,12 +34,6 @@ static inline void xlnx_pr_decoupler_write(struct xlnx_pr_decoupler_data *d,
> writel(val, d->io_base + offset);
> }
>
> -static inline u32 xlnx_pr_decouple_read(const struct xlnx_pr_decoupler_data *d,
> - u32 offset)
> -{
> - return readl(d->io_base + offset);
> -}
> -
> static int xlnx_pr_decoupler_enable_set(struct fpga_bridge *bridge, bool enable)
> {
> int err;
> --
> 2.27.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-18 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-17 23:06 [PATCH] fpga: xilinx-pr-decoupler: remove unused xlnx_pr_decouple_read function Tom Rix
2023-03-18 9:59 ` Xu Yilun [this message]
2023-03-18 12:59 ` Tom Rix
2023-03-20 1:32 ` Xu Yilun
2023-03-20 7:40 ` Michal Simek
2023-03-20 14:16 ` Xu Yilun
2023-03-20 16:24 ` Tom Rix
2023-03-20 20:05 ` Tom Rix
2023-03-21 15:35 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZBWLeC7UuDf+4dJE@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050 \
--to=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).