linux-fscrypt.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Murphy Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Murphy Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] generic: add test for non-root use of fscrypt API additions
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:20:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120022057.6bgrpd5iu34455ty@xzhoux.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200119182542.GA913@sol.localdomain>

On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:25:42AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 01:45:15PM +0800, Murphy Zhou wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:16:40AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > > 
> > > Test non-root use of the fscrypt filesystem-level encryption keyring and
> > > v2 encryption policies.
> > 
> > This testcase now fails on latest Linus tree with latest e2fsprogs
> > on ext4:
> > 
> > FSTYP         -- ext4
> > PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 dell-pesc430-01 5.4.0+ #1 SMP Mon Nov 25 16:40:55 EST 2019
> > MKFS_OPTIONS  -- /dev/sda3
> > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sda3 /mnt/xfstests/mnt2
> > generic/581	- output mismatch (see /var/lib/xfstests/results//generic/581.out.bad)
> >     --- tests/generic/581.out	2019-11-25 20:30:04.536051638 -0500
> >     +++ /var/lib/xfstests/results//generic/581.out.bad	2019-11-26 01:04:17.318332220 -0500
> >     @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> >      Added encryption key
> >      Added encryption key
> >      Added encryption key
> >     -Error adding encryption key: Disk quota exceeded
> >     +Added encryption key
> >      
> >      # Adding key as root
> > ...
> > 
> > A rough looking back shows that this probably started since your fscrypt
> > update for 5.5, added support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 encryption policies.
> > 
> > I guess you are aware of this :-)
> > 
> 
> Nope, this has been passing for me.  I don't see how this can have anything to
> do with the fscrypt update for 5.5.  I'm guessing this is a race condition in
> the test caused by the kernel's keyrings subsystem reclaiming the keys quota
> asynchronously.  I'll see if I can find a way to reproduce it and make the test
> more reliable.

OK, Thanks for the info. I'll try to bisect.

> 
> - Eric
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-20  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-15 18:16 [PATCH v3 0/9] xfstests: add tests for fscrypt key management improvements Eric Biggers
2019-10-15 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] common/encrypt: disambiguate session encryption keys Eric Biggers
2019-10-15 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] common/encrypt: add helper functions that wrap new xfs_io commands Eric Biggers
2019-10-15 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] common/encrypt: support checking for v2 encryption policy support Eric Biggers
2019-10-15 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] common/encrypt: support verifying ciphertext of v2 encryption policies Eric Biggers
2019-10-15 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] generic: add basic test for fscrypt API additions Eric Biggers
2019-10-15 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] generic: add test for non-root use of " Eric Biggers
2020-01-19  5:45   ` Murphy Zhou
2020-01-19 18:25     ` Eric Biggers
2020-01-20  2:20       ` Murphy Zhou [this message]
2020-01-29  0:45         ` Eric Biggers
2019-10-15 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] generic: verify ciphertext of v2 encryption policies with AES-256 Eric Biggers
2019-10-15 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] generic: verify ciphertext of v2 encryption policies with AES-128 Eric Biggers
2019-10-15 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] generic: verify ciphertext of v2 encryption policies with Adiantum Eric Biggers
2019-10-23 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] xfstests: add tests for fscrypt key management improvements Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200120022057.6bgrpd5iu34455ty@xzhoux.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=xzhou@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).