linux-fscrypt.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/6] fscrypt preparations for encryption+casefolding
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:31:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120223201.241390-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)

This is a cleaned up and fixed version of the fscrypt patches to prepare
for directories that are both encrypted and casefolded.

Patches 1-3 start deriving a SipHash key for the new dirhash method that
will be used by encrypted+casefolded directories.  To avoid unnecessary
overhead, we only do this if the directory is actually casefolded.

Patch 4 fixes a bug in UBIFS where it didn't gracefully handle invalid
hash values in fscrypt no-key names.  This is an existing bug, but the
new fscrypt no-key name format (patch 6) made it much easier to trigger;
it started being hit by 'kvm-xfstests -c ubifs -g encrypt'.

Patch 5 updates UBIFS to make it ready for the new fscrypt no-key name
format that always includes the dirhash.

Patch 6 modifies the fscrypt no-key names to always include the dirhash,
since with the new dirhash method the dirhash will no longer be
computable from the ciphertext filename without the key.  It also fixes
a longstanding issue where there could be collisions in the no-key
names, due to not using a proper cryptographic hash to abbreviate names.

For more information see the main patch series, which includes the
filesystem-specific changes:
https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/20200117214246.235591-1-drosen@google.com/T/#u

This applies to fscrypt.git#master.

Changed v4 => v5:
  - Fixed UBIFS encryption to work with the new no-key name format.

Daniel Rosenberg (3):
  fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefolding
  fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories
  fscrypt: improve format of no-key names

Eric Biggers (3):
  fscrypt: clarify what is meant by a per-file key
  ubifs: don't trigger assertion on invalid no-key filename
  ubifs: allow both hash and disk name to be provided in no-key names

 Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst |  40 +++--
 fs/crypto/Kconfig                     |   1 +
 fs/crypto/fname.c                     | 239 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h           |  19 +-
 fs/crypto/hooks.c                     |  44 +++++
 fs/crypto/keysetup.c                  |  81 ++++++---
 fs/crypto/keysetup_v1.c               |   4 +-
 fs/crypto/policy.c                    |   7 +
 fs/inode.c                            |   3 +-
 fs/ubifs/dir.c                        |   6 +-
 fs/ubifs/journal.c                    |   4 +-
 fs/ubifs/key.h                        |   1 -
 include/linux/fscrypt.h               |  94 +++-------
 13 files changed, 365 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.0


             reply	other threads:[~2020-01-20 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-20 22:31 Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefolding Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] fscrypt: clarify what is meant by a per-file key Eric Biggers
2020-01-22  1:16   ` Daniel Rosenberg
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] ubifs: don't trigger assertion on invalid no-key filename Eric Biggers
2020-01-22  0:30   ` Eric Biggers
2020-01-24 20:14     ` Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] ubifs: allow both hash and disk name to be provided in no-key names Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] fscrypt: improve format of " Eric Biggers
2020-01-22 23:06 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] fscrypt preparations for encryption+casefolding Eric Biggers
2020-01-23 21:35   ` Daniel Rosenberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200120223201.241390-1-ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=drosen@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).