From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/6] ubifs: don't trigger assertion on invalid no-key filename
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:31:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120223201.241390-5-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200120223201.241390-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
If userspace provides an invalid fscrypt no-key filename which encodes a
hash value with any of the UBIFS node type bits set (i.e. the high 3
bits), gracefully report ENOENT rather than triggering ubifs_assert().
Test case with kvm-xfstests shell:
. fs/ubifs/config
. ~/xfstests/common/encrypt
dev=$(__blkdev_to_ubi_volume /dev/vdc)
ubiupdatevol $dev -t
mount $dev /mnt -t ubifs
mkdir /mnt/edir
xfs_io -c set_encpolicy /mnt/edir
rm /mnt/edir/_,,,,,DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
With the bug, the following assertion fails on the 'rm' command:
[ 19.066048] UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 379): ubifs_assert_failed: UBIFS assert failed: !(hash & ~UBIFS_S_KEY_HASH_MASK), in fs/ubifs/key.h:170
Fixes: f4f61d2cc6d8 ("ubifs: Implement encrypted filenames")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10+
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
fs/ubifs/dir.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
index 636c3222c2308..5f937226976a6 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
@@ -228,6 +228,8 @@ static struct dentry *ubifs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
if (nm.hash) {
ubifs_assert(c, fname_len(&nm) == 0);
ubifs_assert(c, fname_name(&nm) == NULL);
+ if (nm.hash & ~UBIFS_S_KEY_HASH_MASK)
+ goto done; /* ENOENT */
dent_key_init_hash(c, &key, dir->i_ino, nm.hash);
err = ubifs_tnc_lookup_dh(c, &key, dent, nm.minor_hash);
} else {
--
2.25.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-20 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-20 22:31 [PATCH v5 0/6] fscrypt preparations for encryption+casefolding Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefolding Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] fscrypt: clarify what is meant by a per-file key Eric Biggers
2020-01-22 1:16 ` Daniel Rosenberg
2020-01-20 22:31 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-01-22 0:30 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] ubifs: don't trigger assertion on invalid no-key filename Eric Biggers
2020-01-24 20:14 ` Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] ubifs: allow both hash and disk name to be provided in no-key names Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] fscrypt: improve format of " Eric Biggers
2020-01-22 23:06 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] fscrypt preparations for encryption+casefolding Eric Biggers
2020-01-23 21:35 ` Daniel Rosenberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200120223201.241390-5-ebiggers@kernel.org \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=drosen@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).