linux-fscrypt.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>,
	Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] ubifs: don't trigger assertion on invalid no-key filename
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:30:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200122003014.GA180824@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200120223201.241390-5-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 02:31:59PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> 
> If userspace provides an invalid fscrypt no-key filename which encodes a
> hash value with any of the UBIFS node type bits set (i.e. the high 3
> bits), gracefully report ENOENT rather than triggering ubifs_assert().
> 
> Test case with kvm-xfstests shell:
> 
>     . fs/ubifs/config
>     . ~/xfstests/common/encrypt
>     dev=$(__blkdev_to_ubi_volume /dev/vdc)
>     ubiupdatevol $dev -t
>     mount $dev /mnt -t ubifs
>     mkdir /mnt/edir
>     xfs_io -c set_encpolicy /mnt/edir
>     rm /mnt/edir/_,,,,,DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
> 
> With the bug, the following assertion fails on the 'rm' command:
> 
>     [   19.066048] UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 379): ubifs_assert_failed: UBIFS assert failed: !(hash & ~UBIFS_S_KEY_HASH_MASK), in fs/ubifs/key.h:170
> 
> Fixes: f4f61d2cc6d8 ("ubifs: Implement encrypted filenames")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10+
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Richard, can you review the two UBIFS patches in this series, and if you're okay
with them, provide Acked-by's so that we can take them through the fscrypt tree?
They don't conflict with anything currently in the UBIFS tree.

Thanks!

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-22  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-20 22:31 [PATCH v5 0/6] fscrypt preparations for encryption+casefolding Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefolding Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] fscrypt: clarify what is meant by a per-file key Eric Biggers
2020-01-22  1:16   ` Daniel Rosenberg
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] ubifs: don't trigger assertion on invalid no-key filename Eric Biggers
2020-01-22  0:30   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-01-24 20:14     ` Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] ubifs: allow both hash and disk name to be provided in no-key names Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] fscrypt: improve format of " Eric Biggers
2020-01-22 23:06 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] fscrypt preparations for encryption+casefolding Eric Biggers
2020-01-23 21:35   ` Daniel Rosenberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200122003014.GA180824@gmail.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=drosen@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).