Linux-FSCrypt Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] fs: Add standard casefolding support
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 19:55:43 -0800
Message-ID: <20200212035543.GD870@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200208013552.241832-3-drosen@google.com>

On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 05:35:46PM -0800, Daniel Rosenberg wrote:
> This adds general supporting functions for filesystems that use
> utf8 casefolding. It provides standard dentry_operations and adds the
> necessary structures in struct super_block to allow this standardization.
> 
> Ext4 and F2fs are switch to these implementations.

I think you mean that ext4 and f2fs *will be switched* to these implementations?
It's later in the series, not in this patch.

> +#ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE
> +bool needs_casefold(const struct inode *dir)
> +{
> +	return IS_CASEFOLDED(dir) && dir->i_sb->s_encoding &&
> +			(!IS_ENCRYPTED(dir) || fscrypt_has_encryption_key(dir));
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(needs_casefold);

Can you add kerneldoc comments to all the new functions that are exported to
modules?

> +struct hash_ctx {
> +	struct utf8_itr_context ctx;
> +	unsigned long hash;
> +};
> +
> +static int do_generic_ci_hash(struct utf8_itr_context *ctx, int byte, int pos)
> +{
> +	struct hash_ctx *hctx = container_of(ctx, struct hash_ctx, ctx);
> +
> +	hctx->hash = partial_name_hash((unsigned char)byte, hctx->hash);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int generic_ci_d_hash(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *str)
> +{
> +	const struct inode *inode = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_inode);
> +	struct super_block *sb = dentry->d_sb;
> +	const struct unicode_map *um = sb->s_encoding;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	struct hash_ctx hctx;
> +
> +	if (!inode || !needs_casefold(inode))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	hctx.hash = init_name_hash(dentry);
> +	hctx.ctx.actor = do_generic_ci_hash;
> +	ret = utf8_casefold_iter(um, str, &hctx.ctx);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto err;
> +	str->hash = end_name_hash(hctx.hash);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +err:
> +	if (sb_has_enc_strict_mode(sb))
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_ci_d_hash);
> +#endif

This breaks the !strict_mode case by starting to fail lookups of names that
aren't valid Unicode, instead of falling back to the standard case-sensitive
behavior.

There is an xfstest for casefolding; is this bug not caught by it (in which case
the test needs to be improved)?  Or did you just not run it?

> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 6eae91c0668f9..a260afbc06d22 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1382,6 +1382,12 @@ extern int send_sigurg(struct fown_struct *fown);
>  #define SB_ACTIVE	(1<<30)
>  #define SB_NOUSER	(1<<31)
>  
> +/* These flags relate to encoding and casefolding */
> +#define SB_ENC_STRICT_MODE_FL	(1 << 0)

It would be helpful if the comment mentioned that these flags are stored on-disk
(and therefore can't be re-numbered, unlike the other flags defined nearby).

> +#ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE
> +	struct unicode_map *s_encoding;
> +	__u16 s_encoding_flags;
>  #endif

This isn't a UAPI header, so 's_encoding_flags' should use u16, not __u16.

And for that matter, 's_encoding_flags' will be pointer-sized due to padding
anyway, so maybe just make it 'unsigned int'?

> +static inline bool needs_casefold(const struct inode *dir)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif

Use false instead of 0 for 'bool'.

- Eric

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-08  1:35 [PATCH v7 0/8] Support fof Casefolding and Encryption Daniel Rosenberg
2020-02-08  1:35 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] unicode: Add utf8_casefold_iter Daniel Rosenberg
2020-02-12  3:38   ` Eric Biggers
2020-02-14 21:47     ` Daniel Rosenberg
2020-02-17 19:02       ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-02-08  1:35 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] fs: Add standard casefolding support Daniel Rosenberg
2020-02-08  2:12   ` Al Viro
2020-02-10 23:11     ` Daniel Rosenberg
2020-02-10 23:42       ` Al Viro
2020-02-12  6:34         ` Eric Biggers
2020-02-12  6:57           ` Eric Biggers
2020-02-20  2:27             ` Daniel Rosenberg
2020-02-12  3:55   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-02-08  1:35 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] f2fs: Use generic " Daniel Rosenberg
2020-02-12  4:05   ` Eric Biggers
2020-02-08  1:35 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] ext4: " Daniel Rosenberg
2020-02-08  1:35 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] fscrypt: Have filesystems handle their d_ops Daniel Rosenberg
2020-02-12  4:33   ` Eric Biggers
2020-02-08  1:35 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] f2fs: Handle casefolding with Encryption Daniel Rosenberg
2020-02-12  5:10   ` Eric Biggers
2020-02-12  5:55     ` Al Viro
2020-02-12  6:06       ` Eric Biggers
2020-02-12  5:47   ` Eric Biggers
2020-02-08  1:35 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] ext4: Hande casefolding with encryption Daniel Rosenberg
2020-02-12  5:59   ` Eric Biggers
2020-02-08  1:35 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] ext4: Optimize match for casefolded encrypted dirs Daniel Rosenberg
2020-02-12  6:12 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] Support fof Casefolding and Encryption Eric Biggers
2020-02-13  0:01   ` Daniel Rosenberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200212035543.GD870@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=drosen@google.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-FSCrypt Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/0 linux-fscrypt/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-fscrypt linux-fscrypt/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt \
		linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-fscrypt

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-fscrypt


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git