From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2] generic: test fscrypt key eviction racing with inode dirtying
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:40:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200323164034.69031-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Add a regression test for a bug in the FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY
ioctl fixed by commit 2b4eae95c736 ("fscrypt: don't evict dirty inodes
after removing key").
This ioctl is also tested by generic/580 and generic/581, but they
didn't cover the case where this bug occurs.
This test detects the bug on ext4, f2fs, and ubifs. The multi-threaded
part of the test actually still fails on ubifs even with the fix, due to
another kernel bug which I'm working on fixing.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
Changed v1 => v2:
- Added upstream commit ID.
- Removed RFC tag.
- Removed some unnecessary output suppressions.
tests/generic/900 | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/generic/900.out | 10 ++++
tests/generic/group | 1 +
3 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/generic/900
create mode 100644 tests/generic/900.out
diff --git a/tests/generic/900 b/tests/generic/900
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..8c8671ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/generic/900
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright 2020 Google LLC
+#
+# FS QA Test No. 900
+#
+# Regression test for a bug in the FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl fixed by
+# commit 2b4eae95c736 ("fscrypt: don't evict dirty inodes after removing key").
+# This bug could cause writes to encrypted files to be lost if they raced with
+# the corresponding fscrypt master key being removed. With f2fs, this bug could
+# also crash the kernel.
+#
+seq=`basename $0`
+seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
+echo "QA output created by $seq"
+
+here=`pwd`
+tmp=/tmp/$$
+status=1 # failure is the default!
+trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+ # Stop all subprocesses.
+ touch $tmp.done
+ wait
+
+ rm -f $tmp.*
+}
+
+# get standard environment, filters and checks
+. ./common/rc
+. ./common/filter
+. ./common/encrypt
+
+# remove previous $seqres.full before test
+rm -f $seqres.full
+
+# real QA test starts here
+_supported_fs generic
+_supported_os Linux
+_require_scratch_encryption -v 2
+_require_command "$KEYCTL_PROG" keyctl
+
+_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
+_scratch_mount
+
+dir=$SCRATCH_MNT/dir
+runtime=$((4 * TIME_FACTOR))
+
+# Create an encrypted directory.
+mkdir $dir
+_set_encpolicy $dir $TEST_KEY_IDENTIFIER
+_add_enckey $SCRATCH_MNT "$TEST_RAW_KEY"
+
+# Start with a single-threaded reproducer:
+echo -e "\n# Single-threaded reproducer"
+# Keep a fd open to a file past its fscrypt master key being removed.
+exec 3>$dir/file
+_rm_enckey $SCRATCH_MNT $TEST_KEY_IDENTIFIER
+# Write to and close the open fd.
+echo contents >&3
+exec 3>&-
+# Drop any dentries which might be pinning the inode for "file".
+echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
+# In buggy kernels, the inode for "file" was evicted despite the dirty data,
+# causing the dirty data to be lost. Check whether the write made it through.
+_add_enckey $SCRATCH_MNT "$TEST_RAW_KEY"
+cat $dir/file
+rm -f $dir/file
+
+# Also run a multi-threaded reproducer. This is included for good measure, as
+# this type of thing tends to be good for finding other bugs too.
+echo -e "\n# Multi-threaded reproducer"
+touch $dir/file
+
+# One process add/removes the encryption key repeatedly.
+(
+ while [ ! -e $tmp.done ]; do
+ _add_enckey $SCRATCH_MNT "$TEST_RAW_KEY" > /dev/null
+ _rm_enckey $SCRATCH_MNT $TEST_KEY_IDENTIFIER &> /dev/null
+ done
+) &
+
+# Another process repeatedly tries to append to the encrypted file. The file is
+# re-opened each time, so that there are chances for the inode to be evicted.
+# Failures to open the file due to the key being removed are ignored.
+(
+ touch $tmp.expected
+ while [ ! -e $tmp.done ]; do
+ if sh -c "echo -n X >> $dir/file" 2>/dev/null; then
+ # Keep track of the expected file contents.
+ echo -n X >> $tmp.expected
+ fi
+ done
+) &
+
+# Run for a while.
+sleep $runtime
+
+# Stop all subprocesses.
+touch $tmp.done
+wait
+
+# Make sure no writes were lost.
+_add_enckey $SCRATCH_MNT "$TEST_RAW_KEY" > /dev/null
+stat $tmp.expected >> $seqres.full
+stat $dir/file >> $seqres.full
+cmp $tmp.expected $dir/file
+
+echo "Multi-threaded reproducer done"
+
+# success, all done
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/generic/900.out b/tests/generic/900.out
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..14fde4c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/generic/900.out
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+QA output created by 900
+Added encryption key with identifier 69b2f6edeee720cce0577937eb8a6751
+
+# Single-threaded reproducer
+Removed encryption key with identifier 69b2f6edeee720cce0577937eb8a6751, but files still busy
+Added encryption key with identifier 69b2f6edeee720cce0577937eb8a6751
+contents
+
+# Multi-threaded reproducer
+Multi-threaded reproducer done
diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group
index dc95b77b..0852fc31 100644
--- a/tests/generic/group
+++ b/tests/generic/group
@@ -595,3 +595,4 @@
591 auto quick rw pipe splice
592 auto quick encrypt
593 auto quick encrypt
+900 auto quick encrypt
--
2.25.1.696.g5e7596f4ac-goog
reply other threads:[~2020-03-23 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200323164034.69031-1-ebiggers@kernel.org \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).