From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D51C433E3 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77932098B for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="IQBU2NQm" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726331AbgFQMXd (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:23:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39402 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725967AbgFQMXd (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:23:33 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110BEC061573; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:23:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=kuxQjzZYMs0tFNd2RWRJXl84IRXkLYtgdsZsfAqzUYg=; b=IQBU2NQmYfbU9KEVYJFVsVFYt3 +7GWl3H6cqgUcZ3+um4sERSLuBbzrv7jNZkdM2ZwoSGps038Nt8YY6ApW7PCwZCMfBc10Gz0GDyzO FLEfO9i0HAYVGksHFDKWFRCvjngG1ecDhElpGpw4HbCuIF3Vgh8+lquymjHTFre2rQkZtiIdou22y K/Aznp4o73iZczN2ksz99zOnq95b5QaAhubthCZzggr2DMMUwYzN2WxAT6vZxmfMDafnFj+QcCY/1 +vXnWv1CMw2nHqOvDrXxSQKys1aoXcvwws0qgcZ/d+QvYDKvCoK1AjvkCvq5Nft1Yp25qyw3Vw/EI 56Yd0PTA==; Received: from willy by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jlX69-0005Xm-3Z; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:23:21 +0000 Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:23:21 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Michal Hocko Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, Joe Perches , Waiman Long , Andrew Morton , David Howells , Jarkko Sakkinen , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Linus Torvalds , David Rientjes , Johannes Weiner , Dan Carpenter , "Jason A . Donenfeld" , linux-mm@kvack.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() Message-ID: <20200617122321.GJ8681@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20200616015718.7812-1-longman@redhat.com> <20200616230130.GJ27795@twin.jikos.cz> <20200617003711.GD8681@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200617071212.GJ9499@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200617110820.GG8681@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200617113157.GM9499@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200617113157.GM9499@dhcp22.suse.cz> Sender: linux-fscrypt-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:31:57PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 17-06-20 04:08:20, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > If you call vfree() under > > a spinlock, you're in trouble. in_atomic() only knows if we hold a > > spinlock for CONFIG_PREEMPT, so it's not safe to check for in_atomic() > > in __vfree(). So we need the warning in order that preempt people can > > tell those without that there is a bug here. > > ... Unless I am missing something in_interrupt depends on preempt_count() as > well so neither of the two is reliable without PREEMPT_COUNT configured. preempt_count() always tracks whether we're in interrupt context, regardless of CONFIG_PREEMPT. The difference is that CONFIG_PREEMPT will track spinlock acquisitions as well.