From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fscrypt: fix derivation of SipHash keys on big endian CPUs
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:55:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210527225525.2365513-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Typically, the cryptographic APIs that fscrypt uses take keys as byte
arrays, which avoids endianness issues. However, siphash_key_t is an
exception. It is defined as 'u64 key[2];', i.e. the 128-bit key is
expected to be given directly as two 64-bit words in CPU endianness.
fscrypt_derive_dirhash_key() forgot to take this into account.
Therefore, the SipHash keys used to index encrypted+casefolded
directories differ on big endian vs. little endian platforms.
This makes such directories non-portable between these platforms.
Fix this by always using the little endian order. This is a breaking
change for big endian platforms, but this should be fine in practice
since the encrypt+casefold support isn't known to actually be used on
any big endian platforms yet.
Fixes: aa408f835d02 ("fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
fs/crypto/keysetup.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/crypto/keysetup.c b/fs/crypto/keysetup.c
index 261293fb7097..4d98377c07a7 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/keysetup.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/keysetup.c
@@ -221,6 +221,16 @@ int fscrypt_derive_dirhash_key(struct fscrypt_info *ci,
sizeof(ci->ci_dirhash_key));
if (err)
return err;
+
+ /*
+ * The SipHash APIs expect the key as a pair of 64-bit words, not as a
+ * byte array. Make sure to use a consistent endianness.
+ */
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(ci->ci_dirhash_key) != 16);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(ci->ci_dirhash_key.key) != 2);
+ le64_to_cpus(&ci->ci_dirhash_key.key[0]);
+ le64_to_cpus(&ci->ci_dirhash_key.key[1]);
+
ci->ci_dirhash_key_initialized = true;
return 0;
}
--
2.32.0.rc0.204.g9fa02ecfa5-goog
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-27 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-27 22:55 Eric Biggers [this message]
2021-06-05 7:29 ` [PATCH] fscrypt: fix derivation of SipHash keys on big endian CPUs Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210527225525.2365513-1-ebiggers@kernel.org \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=drosen@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).