linux-fscrypt.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Subject: [PATCH] fs-verity: fix signed integer overflow with i_size near S64_MAX
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:34:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210916203424.113376-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

If the file size is almost S64_MAX, the calculated number of Merkle tree
levels exceeds FS_VERITY_MAX_LEVELS, causing FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY to
fail.  This is unintentional, since as the comment above the definition
of FS_VERITY_MAX_LEVELS states, it is enough for over U64_MAX bytes of
data using SHA-256 and 4K blocks.  (Specifically, 4096*128**8 >= 2**64.)

The bug is actually that when the number of blocks in the first level is
calculated from i_size, there is a signed integer overflow due to i_size
being signed.  Fix this by treating i_size is unsigned.

This was found by the new test "generic: test fs-verity EFBIG scenarios"
(https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b1d116cd4d0ea74b9cd86f349c672021e005a75c.1631558495.git.boris@bur.io).

This didn't affect ext4 or f2fs since those have a smaller maximum file
size, but it did affect btrfs which allows files up to S64_MAX bytes.

Reported-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Fixes: 3fda4c617e84 ("fs-verity: implement FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY ioctl")
Fixes: fd2d1acfcadf ("fs-verity: add the hook for file ->open()")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
 fs/verity/enable.c | 2 +-
 fs/verity/open.c   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/verity/enable.c b/fs/verity/enable.c
index 77e159a0346b1..60a4372aa4d75 100644
--- a/fs/verity/enable.c
+++ b/fs/verity/enable.c
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int build_merkle_tree(struct file *filp,
 	 * (level 0) and ascending to the root node (level 'num_levels - 1').
 	 * Then at the end (level 'num_levels'), calculate the root hash.
 	 */
-	blocks = (inode->i_size + params->block_size - 1) >>
+	blocks = ((u64)inode->i_size + params->block_size - 1) >>
 		 params->log_blocksize;
 	for (level = 0; level <= params->num_levels; level++) {
 		err = build_merkle_tree_level(filp, level, blocks, params,
diff --git a/fs/verity/open.c b/fs/verity/open.c
index 60ff8af7219fe..92df87f5fa388 100644
--- a/fs/verity/open.c
+++ b/fs/verity/open.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int fsverity_init_merkle_tree_params(struct merkle_tree_params *params,
 	 */
 
 	/* Compute number of levels and the number of blocks in each level */
-	blocks = (inode->i_size + params->block_size - 1) >> log_blocksize;
+	blocks = ((u64)inode->i_size + params->block_size - 1) >> log_blocksize;
 	pr_debug("Data is %lld bytes (%llu blocks)\n", inode->i_size, blocks);
 	while (blocks > 1) {
 		if (params->num_levels >= FS_VERITY_MAX_LEVELS) {
-- 
2.33.0


             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-16 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-16 20:34 Eric Biggers [this message]
2021-09-22 17:22 ` [PATCH] fs-verity: fix signed integer overflow with i_size near S64_MAX Boris Burkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210916203424.113376-1-ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris@bur.io \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).