From: "Barror, Robert" <robert.barror@intel.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Hang / zombie process from Xarray page-fault conversion (bisected)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:53:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04FD0F1E52B84F4ABF03487D5C82D4CA773CE75B@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190312043754.GD23020@dastard>
Hi Guys,
"> It's limited to xfs, no failure on ext4 to date", this is incorrect. I have been able to reproduce this issue with ext4. In order to do that, I need to run the full test (on both pmems in the system) and not the half test (only 1 pmem) that I use for inducing the hang under XFS. The test also runs considerably longer before failing with ext4 than XFS.
Thx bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Chinner [mailto:david@fromorbit.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 9:38 PM
To: Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>; Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>; linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>; linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Barror, Robert <robert.barror@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Hang / zombie process from Xarray page-fault conversion (bisected)
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:35:05PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 8:10 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:16:17PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > Hi Willy,
> > >
> > > We're seeing a case where RocksDB hangs and becomes defunct when
> > > trying to kill the process. v4.19 succeeds and v4.20 fails. Robert
> > > was able to bisect this to commit b15cd800682f "dax: Convert page
> > > fault handlers to XArray".
> > >
> > > I see some direct usage of xa_index and wonder if there are some
> > > more pmd fixups to do?
> > >
> > > Other thoughts?
> >
> > I don't see why killing a process would have much to do with PMD
> > misalignment. The symptoms (hanging on a signal) smell much more
> > like leaving a locked entry in the tree. Is this easy to reproduce?
> > Can you get /proc/$pid/stack for a hung task?
>
> It's fairly easy to reproduce, I'll see if I can package up all the
> dependencies into something that fails in a VM.
>
> It's limited to xfs, no failure on ext4 to date.
>
> The hung process appears to be:
>
> kworker/53:1-xfs-sync/pmem0
That's completely internal to XFS. Every 30s the work is triggered and it either does a log flush (if the fs is active) or it syncs the superblock to clean the log and idle the filesystem. It has nothing to do with user processes, and I don't see why killing a process has any effect on what it does...
> ...and then the rest of the database processes grind to a halt from there.
>
> Robert was kind enough to capture /proc/$pid/stack, but nothing interesting:
>
> [<0>] worker_thread+0xb2/0x380
> [<0>] kthread+0x112/0x130
> [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
> [<0>] 0xffffffffffffffff
Much more useful would be:
# echo w > /proc/sysrq-trigger
And post the entire output of dmesg.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-12 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-08 6:16 Hang / zombie process from Xarray page-fault conversion (bisected) Dan Williams
2019-03-11 15:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-03-12 3:35 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-12 4:37 ` Dave Chinner
2019-03-12 16:53 ` Barror, Robert [this message]
2019-03-14 7:34 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-15 2:26 ` Dave Chinner
2019-03-15 2:46 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-04 19:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04FD0F1E52B84F4ABF03487D5C82D4CA773CE75B@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=robert.barror@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).