From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Whitehouse Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a new quotactl command to support 3 quota types in XFS Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:28:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1377088082.2738.19.camel@menhir> References: <1375828029-26360-1-git-send-email-sekharan@us.ibm.com> <20130820222528.GG5262@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chandra Seetharaman , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel , Jan Kara , Abhijith Das To: Ben Myers Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51408 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751522Ab3HUMmb (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:42:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130820222528.GG5262@sgi.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 17:25 -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > Hi Chandra, > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:27:06PM -0500, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > > XFS now supports simultaneous use of 3 quota types (user, group, > > and project). > > > > In order to support this a new quotactl command is introduced > > in this patch series. > > I've applied patches 1 and 2 at git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git, master branch. > I think patch 3 should go through the gfs2 tree. > > Steven, I think if you want to pull in patch 3 you'll also need patch 1. Maybe > the easiest way is to cherry pick it from the xfs tree? If you do we'll have a > trivial merge conflict. Anyway, it's af30cb446dd5 if you want. > > Thanks, > Ben I think it would be better if all the patches went through the same tree to save issues with dependencies. I don't mind if you want to put the gfs2 patches in the xfs tree to keep everything in the same place. There are no current quota changes in the gfs2 tree, so there should not be a conflict due to that. Also, it would be good if Christoph's comments could be addressed too, Steve.