From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:33894 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965330AbcJ2IPI (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2016 04:15:08 -0400 From: Ming Lei To: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Ming Lei , Jens Axboe Subject: [PATCH 41/60] block: blk-merge: try to make front segments in full size Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 16:08:40 +0800 Message-Id: <1477728600-12938-42-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1477728600-12938-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> References: <1477728600-12938-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: When merging one bvec into segment, if the bvec is too big to merge, current policy is to move the whole bvec into another new segment. This patchset changes the policy into trying to maximize size of front segments, that means in above situation, part of bvec is merged into current segment, and the remainder is put into next segment. This patch prepares for support multipage bvec because it can be quite common to see this case and we should try to make front segments in full size. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei --- block/blk-merge.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c index 465d9c65cb41..a6457e70dafc 100644 --- a/block/blk-merge.c +++ b/block/blk-merge.c @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *new = NULL; const unsigned max_sectors = get_max_io_size(q, bio); unsigned bvecs = 0; + unsigned advance; bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, iter) { /* @@ -129,6 +130,7 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q, if (bvprvp && bvec_gap_to_prev(q, bvprvp, bv.bv_offset)) goto split; + advance = 0; if (sectors + (bv.bv_len >> 9) > max_sectors) { /* * Consider this a new segment if we're splitting in @@ -145,12 +147,24 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q, } if (bvprvp && blk_queue_cluster(q)) { - if (seg_size + bv.bv_len > queue_max_segment_size(q)) - goto new_segment; if (!BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(bvprvp, &bv)) goto new_segment; if (!BIOVEC_SEG_BOUNDARY(q, bvprvp, &bv)) goto new_segment; + if (seg_size + bv.bv_len > queue_max_segment_size(q)) { + advance = queue_max_segment_size(q) - seg_size; + + if (advance > 0) { + seg_size += advance; + sectors += advance >> 9; + bv.bv_len -= advance; + bv.bv_offset += advance; + } else { + advance = 0; + } + + goto new_segment; + } seg_size += bv.bv_len; bvprv = bv; @@ -172,6 +186,9 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q, seg_size = bv.bv_len; sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9; + /* restore the bvec for iterator */ + bv.bv_len += advance; + bv.bv_offset -= advance; } do_split = false; @@ -371,16 +388,29 @@ __blk_segment_map_sg(struct request_queue *q, struct bio_vec *bvec, { int nbytes = bvec->bv_len; + int advance = 0; if (*sg && *cluster) { - if ((*sg)->length + nbytes > queue_max_segment_size(q)) - goto new_segment; - if (!BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(bvprv, bvec)) goto new_segment; if (!BIOVEC_SEG_BOUNDARY(q, bvprv, bvec)) goto new_segment; + /* try best to merge part of the bvec into previous seg */ + if ((*sg)->length + nbytes > queue_max_segment_size(q)) { + advance = queue_max_segment_size(q) - (*sg)->length; + if (advance <= 0) { + advance = 0; + goto new_segment; + } + + (*sg)->length += advance; + + bvec->bv_offset += advance; + bvec->bv_len -= advance; + goto new_segment; + } + (*sg)->length += nbytes; } else { new_segment: @@ -403,6 +433,10 @@ __blk_segment_map_sg(struct request_queue *q, struct bio_vec *bvec, sg_set_page(*sg, bvec->bv_page, nbytes, bvec->bv_offset); (*nsegs)++; + + /* for making iterator happy */ + bvec->bv_offset -= advance; + bvec->bv_len += advance; } *bvprv = *bvec; } -- 2.7.4