From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38432 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932451AbdCIS5L (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:57:11 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 11/27] afs: inode: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER() From: David Howells To: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andreea-Cristina Bernat , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 18:57:03 +0000 Message-ID: <148908582325.16794.13028557204537948191.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <148908574888.16794.14109877851518811944.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <148908574888.16794.14109877851518811944.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Andreea-Cristina Bernat The use of "rcu_assign_pointer()" is NULLing out the pointer. According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment: "1. This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer" it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a smaller overhead. The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used: @@ @@ - rcu_assign_pointer + RCU_INIT_POINTER (..., NULL) Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat Signed-off-by: David Howells --- fs/afs/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/afs/inode.c b/fs/afs/inode.c index ade6ec3873cf..e083e086b7ca 100644 --- a/fs/afs/inode.c +++ b/fs/afs/inode.c @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ void afs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) mutex_lock(&vnode->permits_lock); permits = vnode->permits; - rcu_assign_pointer(vnode->permits, NULL); + RCU_INIT_POINTER(vnode->permits, NULL); mutex_unlock(&vnode->permits_lock); if (permits) call_rcu(&permits->rcu, afs_zap_permits);