From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
hch@lst.de, hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 06/11] mm, memory_failure: Collect mapping size in collect_procs()
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 14:40:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <153074045526.27838.11460088022513024933.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <153074042316.27838.17319837331947007626.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
In preparation for supporting memory_failure() for dax mappings, teach
collect_procs() to also determine the mapping size. Unlike typical
mappings the dax mapping size is determined by walking page-table
entries rather than using the compound-page accounting for THP pages.
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 9d142b9b86dc..4d70753af59c 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -174,22 +174,51 @@ int hwpoison_filter(struct page *p)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hwpoison_filter);
/*
+ * Kill all processes that have a poisoned page mapped and then isolate
+ * the page.
+ *
+ * General strategy:
+ * Find all processes having the page mapped and kill them.
+ * But we keep a page reference around so that the page is not
+ * actually freed yet.
+ * Then stash the page away
+ *
+ * There's no convenient way to get back to mapped processes
+ * from the VMAs. So do a brute-force search over all
+ * running processes.
+ *
+ * Remember that machine checks are not common (or rather
+ * if they are common you have other problems), so this shouldn't
+ * be a performance issue.
+ *
+ * Also there are some races possible while we get from the
+ * error detection to actually handle it.
+ */
+
+struct to_kill {
+ struct list_head nd;
+ struct task_struct *tsk;
+ unsigned long addr;
+ short size_shift;
+ char addr_valid;
+};
+
+/*
* Send all the processes who have the page mapped a signal.
* ``action optional'' if they are not immediately affected by the error
* ``action required'' if error happened in current execution context
*/
-static int kill_proc(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long addr,
- unsigned long pfn, struct page *page, int flags)
+static int kill_proc(struct to_kill *tk, unsigned long pfn, int flags)
{
- short addr_lsb;
+ struct task_struct *t = tk->tsk;
+ short addr_lsb = tk->size_shift;
int ret;
pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: Killing %s:%d due to hardware memory corruption\n",
pfn, t->comm, t->pid);
- addr_lsb = compound_order(compound_head(page)) + PAGE_SHIFT;
if ((flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED) && t->mm == current->mm) {
- ret = force_sig_mceerr(BUS_MCEERR_AR, (void __user *)addr,
+ ret = force_sig_mceerr(BUS_MCEERR_AR, (void __user *)tk->addr,
addr_lsb, current);
} else {
/*
@@ -198,7 +227,7 @@ static int kill_proc(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long addr,
* This could cause a loop when the user sets SIGBUS
* to SIG_IGN, but hopefully no one will do that?
*/
- ret = send_sig_mceerr(BUS_MCEERR_AO, (void __user *)addr,
+ ret = send_sig_mceerr(BUS_MCEERR_AO, (void __user *)tk->addr,
addr_lsb, t); /* synchronous? */
}
if (ret < 0)
@@ -235,35 +264,6 @@ void shake_page(struct page *p, int access)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shake_page);
/*
- * Kill all processes that have a poisoned page mapped and then isolate
- * the page.
- *
- * General strategy:
- * Find all processes having the page mapped and kill them.
- * But we keep a page reference around so that the page is not
- * actually freed yet.
- * Then stash the page away
- *
- * There's no convenient way to get back to mapped processes
- * from the VMAs. So do a brute-force search over all
- * running processes.
- *
- * Remember that machine checks are not common (or rather
- * if they are common you have other problems), so this shouldn't
- * be a performance issue.
- *
- * Also there are some races possible while we get from the
- * error detection to actually handle it.
- */
-
-struct to_kill {
- struct list_head nd;
- struct task_struct *tsk;
- unsigned long addr;
- char addr_valid;
-};
-
-/*
* Failure handling: if we can't find or can't kill a process there's
* not much we can do. We just print a message and ignore otherwise.
*/
@@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ static void add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p,
}
tk->addr = page_address_in_vma(p, vma);
tk->addr_valid = 1;
+ tk->size_shift = compound_order(compound_head(p)) + PAGE_SHIFT;
/*
* In theory we don't have to kill when the page was
@@ -317,9 +318,8 @@ static void add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p,
* Also when FAIL is set do a force kill because something went
* wrong earlier.
*/
-static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill,
- bool fail, struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
- int flags)
+static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill, bool fail,
+ unsigned long pfn, int flags)
{
struct to_kill *tk, *next;
@@ -342,8 +342,7 @@ static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill,
* check for that, but we need to tell the
* process anyways.
*/
- else if (kill_proc(tk->tsk, tk->addr,
- pfn, page, flags) < 0)
+ else if (kill_proc(tk, pfn, flags) < 0)
pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: Cannot send advisory machine check signal to %s:%d\n",
pfn, tk->tsk->comm, tk->tsk->pid);
}
@@ -1012,7 +1011,7 @@ static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn,
* any accesses to the poisoned memory.
*/
forcekill = PageDirty(hpage) || (flags & MF_MUST_KILL);
- kill_procs(&tokill, forcekill, !unmap_success, p, pfn, flags);
+ kill_procs(&tokill, forcekill, !unmap_success, pfn, flags);
return unmap_success;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-04 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-04 21:40 [PATCH v5 00/11] mm: Teach memory_failure() about ZONE_DEVICE pages Dan Williams
2018-07-04 21:40 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] device-dax: Convert to vmf_insert_mixed and vm_fault_t Dan Williams
2018-07-04 21:40 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] device-dax: Enable page_mapping() Dan Williams
2018-07-04 21:40 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] device-dax: Set page->index Dan Williams
2018-07-04 21:40 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] filesystem-dax: " Dan Williams
2018-07-04 21:40 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] mm, madvise_inject_error: Let memory_failure() optionally take a page reference Dan Williams
2018-07-13 6:31 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2018-07-14 0:34 ` Dan Williams
2018-07-04 21:40 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2018-07-13 6:49 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] mm, memory_failure: Collect mapping size in collect_procs() Naoya Horiguchi
2018-07-04 21:41 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] filesystem-dax: Introduce dax_lock_mapping_entry() Dan Williams
2018-07-05 1:07 ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-05 3:31 ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-05 3:33 ` [PATCH v6] " Dan Williams
2018-09-24 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] " Barret Rhoden
2018-09-27 11:13 ` Jan Kara
2018-07-04 21:41 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] mm, memory_failure: Teach memory_failure() about dev_pagemap pages Dan Williams
2018-07-13 8:52 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2018-07-14 0:28 ` Dan Williams
2018-07-17 6:36 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2018-07-04 21:41 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] x86/mm/pat: Prepare {reserve, free}_memtype() for "decoy" addresses Dan Williams
2018-07-04 21:41 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] x86/memory_failure: Introduce {set, clear}_mce_nospec() Dan Williams
2018-07-04 21:41 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] libnvdimm, pmem: Restore page attributes when clearing errors Dan Williams
2018-07-13 4:44 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] mm: Teach memory_failure() about ZONE_DEVICE pages Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=153074045526.27838.11460088022513024933.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).