From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Subject: [PATCH v9 0/5] vfs: Use dlock list for SB's s_inodes list Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:28:47 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1536780532-4092-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> (raw) v8->v9: - The last 2 patches in v8 were dropped because there is no more user that can use them. - Include Davidlohr's dlock_lists_empty() scaling patch. - Rebase the code to 4.19-rc3. v8 patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/31/776 This patchset has been dormant for almost a year. Now I am going to restart it again. This patchset provides new APIs for a set of distributed locked lists (one/CPU core) to minimize lock and cacheline contention. Insertion and deletion to the list will be cheap and relatively contention free. Lookup, on the other hand, may be a bit more costly as there are multiple lists to iterate. This is not really a problem for the replacement of superblock's inode list by dlock list included in the patchset as lookup isn't needed. Patch 1 introduces the dlock list. The list heads are allocated by kcalloc() instead of percpu_alloc(). Each list head entry is cacheline aligned to minimize contention. Patch 2 replaces the use of list_for_each_entry_safe() in evict_inodes() and invalidate_inodes() by list_for_each_entry(). Patch 3 modifies the superblock and inode structures to use the dlock list. The corresponding functions that reference those structures are modified. Patch 4 makes the sibling CPUs use the same dlock list head to reduce the number of list heads that need to be iterated. Patch 5 improves the performance of dlock_lists_empty() call. See patch 3 for some performance data for this patchset. Davidlohr Bueso (1): lib/dlock-list: Scale dlock_lists_empty() Jan Kara (1): vfs: Remove unnecessary list_for_each_entry_safe() variants Waiman Long (3): lib/dlock-list: Distributed and lock-protected lists vfs: Use dlock list for superblock's inode list lib/dlock-list: Make sibling CPUs share the same linked list fs/block_dev.c | 9 +- fs/drop_caches.c | 9 +- fs/inode.c | 38 +++--- fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 9 +- fs/quota/dquot.c | 14 +- fs/super.c | 7 +- include/linux/dlock-list.h | 250 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/fs.h | 8 +- lib/Makefile | 2 +- lib/dlock-list.c | 325 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 10 files changed, 617 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/linux/dlock-list.h create mode 100644 lib/dlock-list.c -- 1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-09-13 0:35 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-09-12 19:28 Waiman Long [this message] 2018-09-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] lib/dlock-list: Distributed and lock-protected lists Waiman Long 2018-09-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] vfs: Remove unnecessary list_for_each_entry_safe() variants Waiman Long 2018-09-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] vfs: Use dlock list for superblock's inode list Waiman Long 2018-09-17 14:15 ` Davidlohr Bueso 2018-09-17 14:46 ` Waiman Long 2018-09-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] lib/dlock-list: Make sibling CPUs share the same linked list Waiman Long 2018-09-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] lib/dlock-list: Scale dlock_lists_empty() Waiman Long 2018-10-04 7:16 ` Jan Kara 2018-10-04 13:41 ` Waiman Long 2018-10-17 2:51 ` Davidlohr Bueso 2018-09-17 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] prefetch: Remove spin_lock_prefetch() Waiman Long
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1536780532-4092-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com \ --to=longman@redhat.com \ --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \ --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \ --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \ --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \ --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \ --cc=jack@suse.com \ --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vfs: Use dlock list for SB'\''s s_inodes list' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).