linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
To: miklos@szeredi.hu, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] fuse: Introduce generic fuse_copy_aborted()
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:19:41 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <154754758189.4244.13193829723902632197.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154754701031.4244.8089449938935364463.stgit@localhost.localdomain>

There is no a reason to set individual FR_ABORTED state
for every request, since fuse_abort_conn() aborts all
unlocked requests at once. FR_ABORTED bit just makes
fuse_copy_aborted() to end some of requests, which are
in the middle of fuse_dev_do_read() and fuse_dev_do_write(),
but this is not a big deal. These functions may abort
the requests themselves.

The patch kills lock_request and unlock_request(),
and introduces generic fuse_copy_aborted() to use
instead of them. This allows next patches to kill
FR_ABORTED, FR_LOCKED and FR_PRIVATE, and simplify
fuse dev read/write function.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
---
 fs/fuse/dev.c |   82 +++++++++++++--------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index afadf462ec18..4905abfb279e 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -731,43 +731,6 @@ void fuse_force_forget(struct file *file, u64 nodeid)
 	fuse_put_request(fc, req);
 }
 
-/*
- * Lock the request.  Up to the next unlock_request() there mustn't be
- * anything that could cause a page-fault.  If the request was already
- * aborted bail out.
- */
-static int lock_request(struct fuse_req *req)
-{
-	int err = 0;
-	if (req) {
-		spin_lock(&req->waitq.lock);
-		if (test_bit(FR_ABORTED, &req->flags))
-			err = -ENOENT;
-		else
-			set_bit(FR_LOCKED, &req->flags);
-		spin_unlock(&req->waitq.lock);
-	}
-	return err;
-}
-
-/*
- * Unlock request.  If it was aborted while locked, caller is responsible
- * for unlocking and ending the request.
- */
-static int unlock_request(struct fuse_req *req)
-{
-	int err = 0;
-	if (req) {
-		spin_lock(&req->waitq.lock);
-		if (test_bit(FR_ABORTED, &req->flags))
-			err = -ENOENT;
-		else
-			clear_bit(FR_LOCKED, &req->flags);
-		spin_unlock(&req->waitq.lock);
-	}
-	return err;
-}
-
 struct fuse_copy_state {
 	struct fuse_dev *fud;
 	int write;
@@ -812,6 +775,16 @@ static void fuse_copy_finish(struct fuse_copy_state *cs)
 	cs->pg = NULL;
 }
 
+static int fuse_copy_aborted(struct fuse_copy_state *cs)
+{
+	struct fuse_pqueue *pq = &cs->fud->pq;
+
+	if (READ_ONCE(pq->connected))
+		return 0;
+	else
+		return -ENOENT;
+}
+
 /*
  * Get another pagefull of userspace buffer, and map it to kernel
  * address space, and lock request
@@ -821,7 +794,7 @@ static int fuse_copy_fill(struct fuse_copy_state *cs)
 	struct page *page;
 	int err;
 
-	err = unlock_request(cs->req);
+	err = fuse_copy_aborted(cs);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -872,7 +845,7 @@ static int fuse_copy_fill(struct fuse_copy_state *cs)
 		iov_iter_advance(cs->iter, err);
 	}
 
-	return lock_request(cs->req);
+	return fuse_copy_aborted(cs);
 }
 
 /* Do as much copy to/from userspace buffer as we can */
@@ -923,7 +896,7 @@ static int fuse_try_move_page(struct fuse_copy_state *cs, struct page **pagep)
 	struct page *newpage;
 	struct pipe_buffer *buf = cs->pipebufs;
 
-	err = unlock_request(cs->req);
+	err = fuse_copy_aborted(cs);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -980,12 +953,10 @@ static int fuse_try_move_page(struct fuse_copy_state *cs, struct page **pagep)
 		lru_cache_add_file(newpage);
 
 	err = 0;
-	spin_lock(&cs->req->waitq.lock);
-	if (test_bit(FR_ABORTED, &cs->req->flags))
+	if (fuse_copy_aborted(cs))
 		err = -ENOENT;
 	else
 		*pagep = newpage;
-	spin_unlock(&cs->req->waitq.lock);
 
 	if (err) {
 		unlock_page(newpage);
@@ -1005,7 +976,7 @@ static int fuse_try_move_page(struct fuse_copy_state *cs, struct page **pagep)
 	cs->pg = buf->page;
 	cs->offset = buf->offset;
 
-	err = lock_request(cs->req);
+	err = fuse_copy_aborted(cs);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -1021,7 +992,7 @@ static int fuse_ref_page(struct fuse_copy_state *cs, struct page *page,
 	if (cs->nr_segs == cs->pipe->buffers)
 		return -EIO;
 
-	err = unlock_request(cs->req);
+	err = fuse_copy_aborted(cs);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -2172,13 +2143,6 @@ static void end_polls(struct fuse_conn *fc)
  * and all users of the filesystem.  The exception is the combination of an
  * asynchronous request and the tricky deadlock (see
  * Documentation/filesystems/fuse.txt).
- *
- * Aborting requests under I/O goes as follows: 1: Separate out unlocked
- * requests, they should be finished off immediately.  Locked requests will be
- * finished after unlock; see unlock_request(). 2: Finish off the unlocked
- * requests.  It is possible that some request will finish before we can.  This
- * is OK, the request will in that case be removed from the list before we touch
- * it.
  */
 void fuse_abort_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc)
 {
@@ -2187,7 +2151,7 @@ void fuse_abort_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc)
 	spin_lock(&fc->lock);
 	if (fc->connected) {
 		struct fuse_dev *fud;
-		struct fuse_req *req, *next;
+		struct fuse_req *req;
 		LIST_HEAD(to_end);
 		unsigned int i;
 
@@ -2205,17 +2169,6 @@ void fuse_abort_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc)
 
 			spin_lock(&fpq->lock);
 			fpq->connected = 0;
-			list_for_each_entry_safe(req, next, &fpq->io, list) {
-				req->out.h.error = -ECONNABORTED;
-				spin_lock(&req->waitq.lock);
-				set_bit(FR_ABORTED, &req->flags);
-				if (!test_bit(FR_LOCKED, &req->flags)) {
-					set_bit(FR_PRIVATE, &req->flags);
-					__fuse_get_request(req);
-					list_move(&req->list, &to_end);
-				}
-				spin_unlock(&req->waitq.lock);
-			}
 			for (i = 0; i < FUSE_PQ_HASH_SIZE; i++)
 				list_splice_tail_init(&fpq->processing[i],
 						      &to_end);
@@ -2238,6 +2191,7 @@ void fuse_abort_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc)
 		spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
 
 		end_requests(fc, &to_end);
+		fuse_wait_aborted(fc);
 
 		spin_lock(&fc->lock);
 		fc->aborting = false;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-15 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-15 10:19 [PATCH 0/7] fuse: Improve disconnect scheme and avoid taking fpq->lock on hot paths Kirill Tkhai
2019-01-15 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] fuse: Check for fc->connected in fuse_dev_alloc() Kirill Tkhai
2019-01-18 12:07   ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-01-18 12:28     ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-01-23  9:45       ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-01-23  9:55         ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-01-23 10:24           ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-01-15 10:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] fuse: Move flush_bg_queue() up in fuse_abort_conn() Kirill Tkhai
2019-01-15 10:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] fuse: Drop and reacquire fc->lock in middle of fuse_abort_conn() Kirill Tkhai
2019-01-15 10:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] fuse: Add fud pointer to struct fuse_copy_state Kirill Tkhai
2019-01-15 10:19 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2019-01-17  9:48   ` [PATCH 5/7] fuse: Introduce generic fuse_copy_aborted() Miklos Szeredi
2019-01-15 10:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] fuse: Kill unused FR_ABORTED, FR_LOCKED and FR_PRIVATE flags Kirill Tkhai
2019-01-15 10:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] fuse: Kill fuse_pqueue::io list and avoid taking fpq->lock on hot paths Kirill Tkhai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=154754758189.4244.13193829723902632197.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).