From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Steigerwald Subject: Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?) Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 23:10:54 +0200 Message-ID: <1678322.RbzotdStAY@merkaba> References: <19913589.2sLSAqIcyD@merkaba> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: David Lang , Theodore Ts'o , Howard Chu , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith , Pavel Machek , tux3@tux3.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, OGAWA Hirofumi To: Daniel Phillips Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 13:38:24 schrieb Daniel Phillips: > On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:25:38 PM PDT, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 12:37:41 schrieb Daniel Phillips: > >> On 05/13/2015 12:09 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: ... > > > > Daniel, if you want to change the process of patch review and > > inclusion into > > the kernel, model an example of how you would like it to be. This has > > way > > better chances to inspire others to change their behaviors themselves > > than accusing them of bad faith. > > > > Its yours to choose. > > > > What outcome do you want to create? > > The outcome I would like is: > > * Everybody has a good think about what has gone wrong in the past, > not only with troublesome submitters, but with mutual respect and > collegial conduct. > > * Tux3 is merged on its merits so we get more developers and > testers and move it along faster. > > * I left LKML better than I found it. > > * Group hugs > > Well, group hugs are optional, that one would be situational. Great stuff! Looking forward to it. Thank you, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7