From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] periodic write-back timer optimization Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:23:29 +0100 Message-ID: <200905271323.29818.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20090527130503.4913.62042.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe To: Artem Bityutskiy Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.177]:54227 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759351AbZE0MXg (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2009 08:23:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090527130503.4913.62042.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Hi, > > This is the second attempt. The first one was here: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=124301072305588&w=2 > It was very hacky and got no comments. How does this relate to the per-BDI writeback patches that Jens is working on? Doesn't that require a completely different (probably simpler) implementation of your patch? Arnd <><