From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] vfs: Implement unpoll_file. Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 09:08:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20090606080820.GA16867@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1243893048-17031-2-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Tejun Heo , Alexey Dobriyan , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Eric W. Biederman" To: "Eric W. Biederman" Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:48094 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752071AbZFFIIT (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2009 04:08:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1243893048-17031-2-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 02:50:27PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > From: Eric W. Biederman > > During a revoke operation it is necessary to stop using all state that is managed > by the underlying file operations implementation. The poll wait queue is one part > of that state. Erm... Seeing that drivers and filesystems tend to have fsckloads of other state of their own, why do we treat that separately?