From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valerie Aurora Subject: Re: [PATCH] Userland for VFS based Union Mount (V3) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:22:49 -0400 Message-ID: <20090618032249.GD15048@shell> References: <1242662968-11684-1-git-send-email-jblunck@suse.de> <20090518204019.GC15754@shell> <20090521135315.GA12502@webber.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Blunck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, bharata@in.ibm.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, mszeredi@suse.cz To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:59631 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751306AbZFRDXP (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:23:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090521135315.GA12502@webber.adilger.int> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 09:53:15AM -0400, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On May 18, 2009 16:40 -0400, Valerie Aurora wrote: > > @@ -705,8 +707,9 @@ struct ext2_dir_entry_2 { > > #define EXT2_FT_FIFO 5 > > #define EXT2_FT_SOCK 6 > > #define EXT2_FT_SYMLINK 7 > > +#define EXT2_FT_WHT 8 > > > > -#define EXT2_FT_MAX 8 > > +#define EXT2_FT_MAX 9 > > What about the EXT2_FT_FALLTHROUGH used in the union mount patches? We're UNIX engineers, we don't include unnecessary letters. :) Thanks, I added EXT2_FT_FALLTHRU and made it possible to specify "-O whiteout" in my latest patchset. -VAL