From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] mm: Only IPI CPUs to drain local pages if they exist Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:35:04 -0800 Message-ID: <20120105183504.GF2393@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1325499859-2262-1-git-send-email-gilad@benyossef.com> <1325499859-2262-8-git-send-email-gilad@benyossef.com> <4F033EC9.4050909@gmail.com> <20120105142017.GA27881@csn.ul.ie> <20120105144011.GU11810@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120105161739.GD27881@csn.ul.ie> <20120105163529.GA11810@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Mel Gorman , KOSAKI Motohiro , Gilad Ben-Yossef , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg , Matt Mackall , Sasha Levin , Rik van Riel , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity To: Russell King - ARM Linux Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120105163529.GA11810@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:35:29PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:17:39PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > > Link please? > > Forwarded, as its still in my mailbox. > > > I'm including a patch below under development that is > > intended to only cope with the page allocator case under heavy memory > > pressure. Currently it does not pass testing because eventually RCU > > gets stalled with the following trace > > > > [ 1817.176001] [] arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace+0x87/0xa0 > > [ 1817.176001] [] __rcu_pending+0x149/0x260 > > [ 1817.176001] [] rcu_check_callbacks+0x5f/0x110 > > [ 1817.176001] [] update_process_times+0x3f/0x80 > > [ 1817.176001] [] tick_sched_timer+0x5b/0xc0 > > [ 1817.176001] [] __run_hrtimer+0xbe/0x1a0 > > [ 1817.176001] [] hrtimer_interrupt+0xc1/0x1e0 > > [ 1817.176001] [] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x63/0xa0 > > [ 1817.176001] [] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20 > > [ 1817.176001] [] vfsmount_lock_local_lock+0x25/0x30 > > [ 1817.176001] [] path_init+0x2d5/0x370 > > [ 1817.176001] [] path_lookupat+0x2d/0x620 > > [ 1817.176001] [] do_path_lookup+0x2f/0xd0 > > [ 1817.176001] [] user_path_at_empty+0x9f/0xd0 > > [ 1817.176001] [] vfs_fstatat+0x4b/0x90 > > [ 1817.176001] [] sys_newlstat+0x1f/0x50 > > [ 1817.176001] [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > > > > It might be a separate bug, don't know for sure. Do you get multiple RCU CPU stall-warning messages? If so, it can be helpful to look at how the stack frame changes over time. These stalls are normally caused by a loop in the kernel with preemption disabled, though other scenarios can also cause them. I am assuming that the CPU is reporting a stall on itself in this case. If not, then it is necessary to look at the stack of the CPU that the stall is being reported for. Thanx, Paul > I'm not going to even pretend to understand what the above backtrace > means: it doesn't look like what I'd expect from the problem which > PeterZ's patch is supposed to address. It certainly doesn't do anything > to address the cpu-going-offline problem you seem to have found. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org